Marsh & Mclennan Interview Guide
Everything we know about interviewing at Marsh & Mclennan: the process stage by stage, what each round tests, compensation by level, and reports from candidates who interviewed.
Interviewing at Marsh & Mclennan
What the process looks like, and what Marsh & Mclennan is really testing for.
You will see an interview mix that heavily emphasizes fit and communication, with behavioral interviewing and project management style questions showing up very prominently in the topic data. Multiple candidate reports also describe video-first behavioral screens and recruiter-led starts, then moving into more structured case or presentation work.
Across the roles covered by the question dataset, the core tests you will face are communication and stakeholder style, data and analysis execution, and structured problem solving. The topic set includes high prominence for DSA, SQL, Excel, and general data analysis, plus project-based technical discussion, QA engineering topics, enterprise risk management, and ERM, and role-specific areas like AE responsibilities and marketing analytics.
The loop is multi-stage and includes a mix of live interviews, panel-style conversations, and online or digital assessments, with some candidates also reporting asynchronous recorded interviews and take-home or live case exercises. Candidate reports show outcomes with no offers in the aggregated offer-rate data, and several reports highlight that clarity on next steps, scheduling, and follow-through can vary.
Even when early rounds feel behavioral and friendly, the process can quickly add assessment or case or presentation-style work, so you should be ready to switch from storytelling to structured problem solving without a long ramp-up.
The Marsh & Mclennan interview process
5 stages, based on 500 candidate reports.
Initial screening
Early stageYou start with a recruiter-led screening to assess basic qualifications and fit for the role. In some cases this appears as an initial screening call, and in other cases candidates described moving quickly into a recorded video-style behavioral screen.
Online or digital assessments
After initial screeningYou may complete online assessments to evaluate technical skills and, in some locations, behavioral or cognitive skills. Candidate reports describe one-way video recordings with time pressure and interactive game-like tasks with additional attention and pen-and-paper components.
Case, written assignment, or competency evaluation
Mid loopSome candidates complete a take-home or live exercise analyzing a client scenario and preparing a recommendation. Other reports and the topic set also point to competency evaluations with practical assessment elements.
Live interviews, including behavioral and panel
Later loopYou meet interviewers for behavioral interviews and deeper conversations, sometimes in panel format with senior leadership or key stakeholders. Reports also describe group case discussions and multiple rounds that keep returning to how you structure thinking and explain it.
Final decision-making
After final interviewsThe process concludes with final decision-making based on all evaluations, and some candidates report a final stage conversation with senior leadership or a regional director. Candidate reports also indicate that updates and follow-through can be inconsistent.
What Marsh & Mclennan evaluates
How often each skill shows up across reported interview loops.
Interview guides by role
Each guide has the questions Marsh & Mclennan interviewers actually ask, the loop structure, and total compensation by level.
What Marsh & Mclennan pays, by level
Estimated total compensation: base salary plus stock and annual cash bonus.
Insider tips
Patterns from candidates who got offers, and the mistakes that most often sink a loop.
Real interview experiences by role
Read what candidates said about interviewing at Marsh & Mclennan: the loop, difficulty, and outcomes, straight from recent reports for each role.
Marsh & Mclennan interview FAQ
Answered from real candidate and workplace data, marked up for rich results.
What people say about Marsh & Mclennan
Verbatim snippets pulled from employee and candidate reviews.
Flexible work hours and engaging projects, along with supportive colleagues, create a positive work environment.
Overall, the experience is great but comes with mixed challenges.
Management should hold direct reports accountable and increase global support to demonstrate the value of these resources to US employees.
H&B leadership lacks effectiveness, making it challenging to transition to new roles while still needing to support previous ones.
The work-life balance is fair, typically requiring 40 hours per week.
Advancement opportunities are limited, making career growth challenging.
Related company guides
Companies that hire for the same data roles, with the same depth of prep.
