Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Business Analyst at Marsh & Mclennan, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After a recruiter call, I moved into a structured sequence that ended with a hiring manager conversation. My first real test was a case-style take-home assignment where I had to identify the problem and then lay out my solution in a presentation-deck format. I prepared the deck, then presented it in the next round. After the presentation, I went straight into behavioral questions that felt centered on how I work and how I communicate.
I went through an interview flow that was pretty centered on people-skill signaling. In my first screen, it was just two interviews: one behavioral and one technical, with the “technical” part focused less on theory and more on talking through the technical work I’d done before. The behavioral side covered how I get along with team members and how I ask questions when I’m trying to understand what’s going on.
Candidates typically start with a screening process that may include asynchronous video interviews, case-style take-home assignments, or interactive assessments. These formats often test situational responses and communication skills under time pressure.
The interview process heavily emphasizes behavioral questions focused on past work experiences, team dynamics, and cultural fit. Candidates should prepare to discuss their contributions in detail and demonstrate clear communication throughout.
Some candidates encounter a case study during the interview process, which requires them to analyze a problem and present their solution. This component assesses both analytical thinking and presentation skills.
Interviews often involve multiple team members and assess how well candidates communicate and interact with others. Candidates are encouraged to show their interpersonal skills and ability to articulate their thoughts clearly.
The overall difficulty of the interview process is generally perceived as average, with a focus on clarity and structured thinking rather than technical prowess. The atmosphere is typically friendly and supportive, which helps candidates feel at ease.
Candidates noted that while the process was generally transparent, some experienced delays or lack of communication post-interview. Clear expectations and timely feedback are valued aspects of the experience.