Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Consultant at Marsh & Mclennan, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I interviewed for a Consultant role with a mostly behavioral, friendly process that moved quickly from intro screens to a small set of interviews.
I interviewed for a Consultant role in a multi-stage loop that blended behavioral screening with an assessment and case elements, and it felt more demanding than the purely behavioral tracks.
The interview process often starts with an introductory call or recorded video interview focusing on behavioral questions related to communication and fit for the consulting role, rather than technical skills.
Candidates typically participate in multiple rounds of behavioral interviews, which emphasize teamwork, conflict resolution, and motivation, often in a conversational format with various interviewers.
Some candidates encounter additional assessment stages, such as Mettl assessments, case studies, or Excel tests, which may vary in presence and difficulty across different interview paths.
Many candidates reported issues with scheduling and communication, including delays between interview rounds and a lack of timely feedback or updates, which can lead to frustration.
Final rounds may involve multiple interviewers and discussions about business priorities, but candidates often experience uncertainty regarding outcomes, including unexpected rejections or low offers.
The overall interview experience is described as structured and candidate-friendly, although some candidates felt the process could be demoralizing due to inconsistent treatment and lack of closure.