Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Included Health, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
This process felt relentlessly technical and puzzle-like. After an early recruiter conversation, I ended up doing a hiring-manager interview and then a technical screen, followed by a virtual onsite that was essentially a longer series of technical evaluations. Across the rounds, the interviews leaned hard on whether I could solve “the right thing” as a puzzle, and it often felt like the interviewer had limited patience for questions or for trying an alternate approach.
After a recruiter call, I moved into a pretty classic sequence: a hiring-manager chat, then a technical screen, and finally a multi-round virtual onsite that stretched across a couple of different days. Coding showed up as practical exercises rather than “perfect code style” gotchas, and I was allowed to use JavaScript or whatever language I preferred. The onsite ended up mixing a system design round, more technical depth (including a front-end angle for a full-stack setup), and a behavioral discussion.
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter call, followed by a technical screen and a multi-round virtual onsite that can span several days. Candidates noted that the overall timeline can extend over a month, with some experiencing delays and rescheduling issues.
Candidates faced a variety of technical questions during coding rounds, including practical exercises and algorithm challenges, often requiring a solid understanding of CS fundamentals. The coding tasks were described as both relevant to the role and sometimes ambiguous, leading to confusion about expectations.
Interviews included behavioral discussions aimed at assessing cultural fit, with some candidates feeling these rounds were more extensive than anticipated. The focus was on understanding candidates' past experiences and how they align with the company's values.
The level of engagement from interviewers varied, with some candidates experiencing interruptions and a lack of collaboration, which hindered their ability to showcase their skills. Positive interactions were noted when interviewers were supportive and allowed candidates to express their thought processes.
Many candidates expressed frustration over the lack of feedback following rejections, often feeling that decisions were made without clear reasoning. This left them uncertain about their performance and the criteria used for evaluation.
The candidate experience varied widely, with some reporting a smooth and respectful process while others encountered significant scheduling issues and unprofessional communication. The inconsistency in experiences contributed to mixed feelings about the company's hiring process.