Dataford
Interview QuestionsInterview GuidesExperiencesCoaching
New
Pricing
Get started
Dataford
Popular roles
Software EngineerData AnalystData ScientistData EngineerBusiness AnalystAI EngineerMachine Learning EngineerProduct Manager
Browse
Browse All RolesEvery role hub, from analyst to MLBrowse All CompaniesCompany-specific interview loopsAll Interview GuidesThe full guide library
Top questions by role
Software EngineerData AnalystData ScientistData EngineerBusiness AnalystAI EngineerMachine Learning EngineerProduct Manager
Top questions by skill
SQLPythonStatisticsMachine LearningA/B TestingSystem DesignGenerative AIProduct SenseMetricsBehavioral
Browse all questions →Try a mock interview
Experiences
Practice
Mock InterviewsTimed interview simulations with feedbackCoaching1:1 coaching with people at your target companiesSuccess PathYour 6-week structured planModulesCurated lessons by topicWebinarsTalks from ex-Big Tech data leadsPlaygroundA free-form scratch editor
Learn
BlogInterview strategy and career adviceTech Job Market ReportHiring trends across data and AI rolesFor UniversitiesDataford for career centersAbout DatafordWho we are and how we build
Pricing
Build my plan

Design Daily Count Reconciliation Process

EasySQL & Data Manipulation00:00
Practice interviewer
In session
5 left
00:00

Your question is Design Daily Count Reconciliation Process. Take a moment with it on the right.

Talk me through your thinking if you like. When you're confident, submit your answer and I'll grade it like a real screen (7/10 or better passes).

You need to log in / sign up to chat or submit.

Problem

Context

Teams often validate ETL reliability by comparing daily record counts in source systems against warehouse tables. This is a common first-line data quality check because it quickly surfaces missing loads, duplicate loads, and date-partition issues.

Question

Explain how you would design a process to compare daily source counts against warehouse counts. Your answer should cover:

  1. How you would define the counting grain and date logic
  2. How you would store or calculate source and warehouse counts
  3. How you would detect mismatches and classify issues
  4. How you would handle late-arriving data, reruns, and acceptable thresholds
  5. What SQL checks or reporting outputs you would produce

Scope Guidance

The interviewer is looking for a practical design explanation, not a full production implementation. Focus on a simple, reliable reconciliation pattern using SQL aggregations, clear assumptions, and operational considerations such as scheduling, idempotency, and alerting.