My process moved fairly quickly and stayed tightly aligned with the kind of work the role implied. I had an initial round that mixed a short technical segment with behavioral questions, then another round that repeated a similar structure. The technical part included a concrete coding-style problem where I had to reason through an array operation, and the behavioral component followed a short, direct format.
Later, I continued into additional technical rounds that leaned toward more standard LeetCode-style medium difficulty questions, each interview lasting about an hour when counted across the session. The panels were professional and attentive, and the overall tone felt like they were trying to evaluate fit rather than trick me.
> 1 year
Average Positive Ciudad de Mexico
The process started with a recruiter reaching out via LinkedIn, followed by a profile-style conversation and then technical coding screens. After the first technical round, there was a wait of a couple of weeks before I got to the next one, which kept the momentum slow.
In the coding round two, I worked through another session where the focus was still on solving the problem effectively within the allotted time. After that, the process shifted into legacy code maintenance—questions and discussion centered on working with existing systems—and then I did a behavioral interview with a manager. The final stage was systems design, which capped the sequence.
Share your interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
