Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Consultant at Xebia, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After an HR call, I went into the technical part pretty quickly. The process was essentially two technical rounds followed by a cultural discussion. The first technical screen felt like it was primarily checking fundamentals, and the second one went deeper—much more hands-on and specific.
The process felt off from the start. I got a call from HR to arrange a screening and they mentioned an email invitation would follow, but I never received that invite. The screening itself was a short 15–20 minute call, and after that I didn’t hear anything back.
The interview process typically consists of multiple rounds, starting with an HR call, followed by two technical rounds, and concluding with cultural and HR discussions. Candidates should be prepared for a structured flow that includes both technical assessments and fit evaluations.
Technical rounds often emphasize practical skills in languages and tools relevant to the role, such as SQL, Python, Databricks, and Java. Candidates should be ready for hands-on problem-solving and scenario-based questions rather than just theoretical knowledge.
Some candidates may encounter coding assignments or assessments that require them to demonstrate their technical abilities in real-world scenarios, often with tight deadlines. Being prepared to discuss and defend their work during follow-up interviews is crucial.
Candidates reported varying experiences with communication throughout the process, with some feeling a lack of clarity and follow-up. It's important to seek clarity on next steps and feedback, especially after technical rounds.
The final stages often include discussions focused on cultural fit and alignment with company values, which can be as important as technical skills. Candidates should be ready to articulate their work style and how they align with the company's culture.
Candidates described the overall difficulty of the interview process as moderate to high, with some finding it demanding but structured. Experiences varied widely, with some candidates feeling well-guided while others faced uncertainty and delays.
