Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at WSP, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process started with a video interview and moved quickly into assessments. I had a HireVue-style format where I recorded responses to prerecorded questions on a webcam, and each prompt gave a short preparation window before a timed answer. The questions I faced focused on my behavioral experiences, my motivation for the role, and my interest in the energy sector.
I went through a more mixed, awkward-feeling stretch of interviews that didn’t quite line up with what I expected. One part of the process started with an email invitation, and the session began with the HR team explaining their company and how the team was structured. After that, I handled a self introduction and joined a group discussion task, which changed the pace from a straight Q&A.
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter screening, followed by a mix of technical and behavioral interviews, often transitioning from online to in-person formats. Candidates noted that the overall flow felt organized, with clear checkpoints and a professional atmosphere throughout.
Candidates experienced a range of technical evaluations, including practical questions related to their CV projects, coding challenges, and domain-specific knowledge, particularly in areas like system design and software engineering principles. The emphasis varied, with some candidates noting a heavier focus on technical depth than others.
Behavioral questions played a significant role in the interviews, often focusing on past experiences, problem-solving approaches, and cultural fit within the team. Candidates reported that these questions were generally conversational and aimed at understanding their motivations and teamwork capabilities.
Several candidates underwent structured assessments that included cognitive tests covering numerical, logical, and verbal reasoning. These tests were often timed and designed to evaluate candidates' quick thinking and problem-solving abilities under pressure.
Overall, candidates described the interview atmosphere as friendly and supportive, with interviewers who were approachable and professional. While some candidates faced challenging or unstructured interviews, many felt that the process was respectful and clear, allowing them to express their qualifications effectively.
While many candidates did not receive offers, they appreciated the clarity of the evaluation criteria and the feedback provided throughout the process. The experience often left candidates feeling that their skills and experiences were adequately assessed, even if the final decision was not in their favor.