I went through the process mostly via a recruiter, and the coordination was the hardest part. The recruiter struggled to communicate effectively, and I lost track of what was happening and when, even though the initial interview itself went well.
As the process dragged, I kept learning that the structure was split into different sub-departments that were described as operating like small start-ups. Because my interaction with the recruiter was so inconsistent, that shifting structure only added to the feeling that I wasn’t getting clean, steady updates.
> 1 year
Average Positive Dublin, Dublin
The process felt responsive and well supported, even if it ran a little long. HR was especially kind—at the end, I received detailed feedback, and that alone made the experience feel respectful and complete.
Across the interviews, the conversations were insightful and the interviewers came across as friendly. It didn’t feel like a grilling session; it felt more like a serious discussion of how I think and how I operate.
> 1 year
Average Negative United States
I went through a long, multi-month process for a PMO leadership role, and it genuinely weighed on me. Because I’m a person of color, I was hopeful giv…
> 1 year
Average Neutral Vancouver, BC
My experience ended up being pretty simple and low-key. I only had one person in the process, and the questions were fairly general. The interviewer w…
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Interview Structure & Timeline
The interview process typically involves a series of structured interviews, including initial HR screening, hiring manager discussions, and multiple peer interviews, often spanning several weeks to months. Candidates noted that while the structure was generally clear, the timeline could feel lengthy and disorganized at times.
TimelineStructured InterviewsHR Screening
Behavioral Interview Focus
Candidates experienced a strong emphasis on behavioral interviews, with questions designed to assess past experiences and how candidates handle various situations. The tone was generally friendly, though some candidates felt that the depth of questioning varied across interviews.
BehavioralSTARPast Experiences
Communication & Follow-Up
Communication from recruiters varied significantly, with some candidates reporting a lack of clarity and follow-up, leading to confusion about the process. While some received detailed feedback, others felt ghosted after completing interviews, which contributed to a negative experience.
CommunicationFeedbackClarity
Assessment & Case Interviews
Some candidates faced case interviews or assessments that tested their problem-solving abilities and approach to project management challenges. These rounds were often seen as rigorous and aimed at evaluating candidates' depth of understanding and ability to handle complexity.
Case InterviewProblem-SolvingAssessment
Overall Candidate Experience
Candidates reported mixed feelings about their overall experience, with some appreciating the thoroughness and challenge of the process, while others found it frustrating due to delays and lack of closure. The experience often left candidates feeling either respected or disappointed based on the follow-through.
Candidate ExperienceRespectFrustration
Final Decision & Offer Outcomes
Many candidates did not receive offers, with some expressing disappointment over the lack of closure after multiple rounds of interviews. The final decisions often felt abrupt or poorly communicated, impacting candidates' perceptions of the company's hiring process.