Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Wood Consulting, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I had a quick, 30-minute Teams interview with one other person. It felt more like a checklist than a conversation: there were generic competency-style and HR questions, plus a few technical questions sprinkled in.
The process felt unusually smooth and calm. I started with a remote conversation with HR and then another call with the line manager, both run in a straightforward way. The atmosphere was serene, and the people I spoke to felt very available and responsive throughout the stage.
The interview process typically starts with an HR screening followed by a technical interview, often with multiple stages that may include coding assessments or managerial discussions. Candidates noted a generally organized and professional flow, but some experienced a lack of clarity in technical evaluations.
Candidates faced a range of technical questions, with some interviews emphasizing practical applications and problem-solving skills, while others were more theoretical. The difficulty varied, with some reporting high expectations for technical depth and rigor.
Many interviews included behavioral questions focused on past experiences and how candidates handled challenges, emphasizing alignment with company values and team dynamics. The atmosphere was often described as friendly, though some candidates felt the process was more of a checklist than a conversation.
The overall atmosphere varied from calm and supportive to more formal and one-sided, with some candidates feeling that interviewers were disengaged. While some appreciated the respectful tone, others found it challenging to gauge their fit due to the lack of interaction.
Some candidates participated in assessment days that included group exercises, technical tests, and presentations, which tested both teamwork and communication skills. These experiences were often described as comprehensive but could feel overwhelming due to the variety of tasks.
Despite a generally smooth process, many candidates did not receive offers, leading to reflections on the need for clearer communication and deeper technical evaluations. Candidates expressed a desire for more engagement and feedback throughout the process.