Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Vanta, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
What stood out most for me wasn’t the technical content—it was the environment and how it came across through the people I interacted with. The overall “culture” felt suffocating from the outside, and the mood I observed was tired and frustrated among engineers.
My process started with an OA, then a recruiter call, and then a standard technical flow that became a virtual onsite. The onsite included two technical rounds and one behavioral round, and the whole thing felt fairly professional and organized.
The recruiter experience is generally described as structured and professional, with some candidates noting helpful communication and clear expectations for each stage. However, others reported disengagement or a lack of depth in discussions, impacting their overall impression of the process.
Candidates typically undergo a technical screen that often involves LeetCode-style coding questions, with a focus on data structures and algorithms. The difficulty level is generally perceived as average to high, and some candidates noted a lack of clarity in problem descriptions that can lead to confusion.
The onsite interviews usually consist of multiple rounds covering coding, system design, and behavioral questions, with a mix of technical and interpersonal evaluations. While some candidates found the process organized, others felt the atmosphere was tense or unfriendly, impacting their performance.
The overall environment during interviews has been described as either supportive or suffocating, with some candidates feeling rushed or that interviewers were disengaged. This emotional tone can significantly affect candidates' perceptions of the company culture and their performance.
Candidates expressed a desire for clearer feedback regarding their performance and the reasons behind decisions. Many noted that the speed of the process often left them without sufficient follow-up or understanding of what went wrong, contributing to a sense of frustration.
Candidates appreciated the availability of preparation materials, but some felt that the expectations set during the recruitment process did not align with the actual interview experience. This mismatch can lead to confusion and disappointment regarding their performance.