My process started with a Codility coding assessment online with three problems, two marked easy and one medium. After that, I moved into a technical-and-team matching panel with three people. The flow began with a quick self-introduction, then shifted into live coding on a whiteboard, and the rest leaned on behavioral questions. A lot of it focused on past projects and how I’d worked and collaborated, including dynamics with classmates.
Once the technical portion was done, I had an HR interview that felt more like a fit conversation. We talked about my behavioral traits and cultural alignment, and it included salary expectations and compensation details. Even though everything was fairly structured, it still felt like the panel wanted both competence and clarity in how I described teamwork.
> 1 year
Easy Positive Taiwan
I went through a pretty compact process: I ended up with an online OA first, then an onsite interview with the hiring manager and team members. The OA was a set of three DSA problems, and the difficulty felt manageable overall.
At the onsite, the conversation blended both DSA and system design alongside other technical questions. I started by grounding the discussion, then we moved into the more structured problem-solving and architecture-style topics. The overall vibe felt straightforward and not overly hostile—more like they were trying to see how I think when details get technical.
> 1 year
Average Neutral Taipei
After my application, I received an email with a test link. The test had three questions and I had to finish within a limited time window. I managed t…
> 1 year
Easy Positive Taipei
I went through a pretty straightforward three-round flow. The first step was an online assessment with a few coding questions, and it felt pretty mana…
> 1 year
Average Positive Taipei
I went through a pretty classic sequence that started with Codility. I was given three problems with a difficulty range described as easy to medium, a…
