Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Transport for London, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After my CV got accepted, I was sent an online assessment on values-based scenarios. It was built around case studies where I had to work through what I’d do, including a ranking-style element, and it leaned heavily into Transport for London’s “green” and sustainability themes along with teamwork. I liked that the interface felt guided—there were resource tiles provided to help me answer the questions—and the whole thing was automated right after I submitted.
I went through a set of online assessments that mixed behavioural and situational multiple-choice questions with video prompts where I had to record my responses. The online part didn’t drag—I was going through prerecorded questions and then moving forward to the next evaluation stage.
The interview process begins with an online application followed by various assessments, including situational and competency-based questions, often delivered through video formats. Candidates should prepare for a structured evaluation that may include multiple-choice questions and recorded responses.
Candidates can expect competency-based interviews that probe their experiences and problem-solving abilities, often using the STAR method. These interviews are designed to assess how well candidates align with the role's requirements and the company's values.
The assessment centre typically includes a mix of group exercises, individual interviews, and presentations, all aimed at evaluating both technical skills and interpersonal dynamics. Candidates should be ready for a full day of activities that test collaboration and communication under pressure.
Technical assessments may involve coding tasks or discussions about past projects, focusing on the candidate's understanding of relevant concepts rather than just memorized knowledge. It's important to prepare for both technical depth and the ability to articulate reasoning.
Candidates will need to navigate group dynamics during collaborative exercises, which can significantly impact their performance. Being able to contribute effectively while also aligning with team members is crucial for success in these scenarios.
While many candidates report a structured and professional process, outcomes can vary widely, with some feeling that the evaluation criteria were complex or that their preparation did not align with the actual assessments. It's important to reflect on the experience for future improvement.