Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Thomson Reuters, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
The first thing I ran into was an online HackerRank assessment. It was made up of multiple-choice questions, and the work had a tight time window—around an hour for roughly twenty questions. Most of the items were centered on AI evaluation, with a smaller mix of general software engineering topics.
After an early step, I went into a sequence that emphasized both AI-focused thinking and communication. The structure was three levels total: first a technical round, followed by two managerial rounds. Instead of coding, the questions centered on understanding AI and generative AI concepts, and the managerial interviews were largely about how I communicated and how aware I was of the field—more about team fit than technical depth.
Candidates typically start with an online assessment that includes multiple-choice questions focused on AI evaluation and general software engineering topics, usually with a tight time limit. This assessment is crucial as it sets the tone for the rest of the process.
The technical interviews often focus on core computer science fundamentals, including database management and object-oriented programming, rather than deep problem-solving or data structures and algorithms. Candidates should be prepared to discuss their past projects and technical stack in detail.
Candidates will encounter managerial interviews that assess communication skills and team fit, often through behavioral questions. These rounds aim to gauge how candidates would integrate into the team and their understanding of the AI field.
The interview process is generally structured and may include multiple rounds, such as technical, managerial, and HR discussions. Candidates should expect a mix of live interviews and take-home assignments, which can extend the timeline significantly.
Candidates often report delays and unclear communication regarding feedback and next steps, which can lead to frustration. It's important to remain proactive and follow up for updates during the waiting periods.
The overall difficulty of the interviews is described as medium, with a focus on understanding candidates' thought processes rather than trick questions. Candidates should be prepared for a thorough evaluation that may feel drawn out.