Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at T. Rowe Price, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After I applied, I was sent a HireVue assessment that had three questions. A few steps later, I got to the final round interview, which included two interviewers. We went over my resume and the conversation felt relaxed and genuinely engaging.
My process felt pretty low-stress and the people I spoke with were consistently friendly and professional. The interviews I had were typically in the 30-minute to an hour range, and there wasn’t much ceremony or heavy structure to follow. A lot of it leaned on walking through my background and experience rather than digging deep into specific technical details.
The interview process typically consists of multiple stages, starting with a screening call, followed by technical assessments, and concluding with behavioral interviews. Candidates noted that timelines can vary significantly, with some experiencing long gaps between stages.
Candidates encountered a variety of technical assessments, including coding exercises, system design discussions, and live coding sessions, often using platforms like Coderbyte. The difficulty level was generally described as average, with some candidates appreciating the opportunity to prepare in advance.
Behavioral interviews were a significant component, focusing on past experiences, teamwork, and alignment with company values rather than technical grilling. Many candidates felt these conversations were more about assessing fit than technical skills.
Overall, candidates reported a friendly and professional environment during interviews, though some experienced logistical issues, such as technical difficulties during coding sessions. The atmosphere was generally described as low-stress and conversational, but a few candidates noted instances of rudeness or disorganization.
Feedback after interviews varied widely, with some candidates receiving no constructive feedback despite successful assessments. Many expressed frustration over a lack of clarity regarding their performance, especially after multiple rounds.
Candidates emphasized the importance of preparation, particularly for technical assessments, and many wished they had focused more on behavioral aspects. Understanding the interview format and expectations ahead of time was seen as beneficial.