Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Stantec, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After a recruiter step, I went into a written mock assignment and a set of basic behavioral questions. The written part was about laying out step-by-step instructions for how I would solve a problem, and the whole interview session ran about an hour. The panel felt genuinely nice and understanding, and the tone didn’t feel adversarial.
I had a process that began normally—HR contact and interviews with the hiring side—but the experience became frustrating because communication and timing never really lined up. I was told I would receive updates, and I even followed up after investing time in assessments and multiple interview steps, including an office visit. Despite that, I never heard back with a final decision.
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter call, followed by a mix of virtual and in-person interviews that may include technical, behavioral, and situational questions. Candidates often experience a structured approach with clear communication about what to expect at each stage.
Candidates may encounter a variety of technical assessments, including online aptitude tests, technical interviews, and specific domain-related questions. The depth of technical questioning can vary significantly, with some candidates reporting a focus on real-world applications while others faced more theoretical or niche topics.
Behavioral questions are a significant component of the interviews, often focusing on past experiences, conflict resolution, and teamwork. Candidates are encouraged to use the STAR method to articulate their responses, as interviewers seek to understand their motivations and fit within the company culture.
The overall tone of the interviews tends to be friendly and conversational, with interviewers aiming to create a comfortable environment. However, some candidates reported instances of interruptions or unclear questions that hindered effective communication.
Candidates have mixed experiences regarding feedback and follow-up communication after interviews, with some feeling well-informed throughout the process while others reported a lack of clarity and long waiting periods without updates.
While many candidates found the interview process to be organized and respectful, the final outcomes varied, with some receiving offers quickly and others feeling left in the dark. The overall impression often hinged on how well the process matched their expectations and the professionalism of the interviewers.