Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Stantec, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I applied online and moved into a recruiter call first, then I did a virtual interview with a mix of team members and managers. The conversation felt friendly and pretty conversational rather than intense, and it mostly circled my academic background, prior internship experience, my interest in bridge engineering, and whether I could be available for field work. Technical questions were minimal, and a lot of the focus was on fit and motivation.
I interviewed with an experienced engineer for an electrical engineering co-op role. It was a virtual session on Zoom, and the format felt fairly direct—there were no behavioral questions at all. Instead, the interview focused almost entirely on technical questions, and it was clear they wanted to see how I handled the subject matter rather than how I described past experiences.
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter call, followed by a mix of virtual and in-person interviews that may include technical, behavioral, and situational questions. Candidates often experience a structured approach with clear communication about what to expect at each stage.
Candidates may encounter a variety of technical assessments, including online aptitude tests, technical interviews, and specific domain-related questions. The depth of technical questioning can vary significantly, with some candidates reporting a focus on real-world applications while others faced more theoretical or niche topics.
Behavioral questions are a significant component of the interviews, often focusing on past experiences, conflict resolution, and teamwork. Candidates are encouraged to use the STAR method to articulate their responses, as interviewers seek to understand their motivations and fit within the company culture.
The overall tone of the interviews tends to be friendly and conversational, with interviewers aiming to create a comfortable environment. However, some candidates reported instances of interruptions or unclear questions that hindered effective communication.
Candidates have mixed experiences regarding feedback and follow-up communication after interviews, with some feeling well-informed throughout the process while others reported a lack of clarity and long waiting periods without updates.
While many candidates found the interview process to be organized and respectful, the final outcomes varied, with some receiving offers quickly and others feeling left in the dark. The overall impression often hinged on how well the process matched their expectations and the professionalism of the interviewers.