Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Skydio, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process kicked off with a recruiter phone screen, then I moved into two projected technical rounds. The overall flow felt pretty straightforward. A lot of what I heard was directly tied to my resume—walking through my background and deciding where it fit—plus a handful of circuit analysis style problems to sanity-check my fundamentals.
I started with a recruiter call, then things moved quickly to a hiring manager conversation. After that, I went through an onsite loop that included a presentation, and the whole structure felt very thorough. What stood out most was how carefully they handled the sequencing—interviewers made sure I really understood the material from one step before letting me progress to the next.
The interview process typically starts with a recruiter call, followed by a series of technical interviews and a final onsite loop, with a clear progression and careful sequencing between rounds. Candidates noted that the structure felt polished and methodical, with a focus on ensuring understanding before moving forward.
Candidates faced a mix of coding challenges, system design questions, and sometimes presentations, with a focus on practical problem-solving and reasoning rather than just theoretical knowledge. The coding questions varied in difficulty, often resembling LeetCode-style problems, and were accompanied by discussions to assess depth of understanding.
Initial rounds often included behavioral questions aimed at understanding candidates' backgrounds and fit for the role, with a strong emphasis on resume-related discussions. This aspect helped establish a foundation before delving into more technical evaluations.
Some candidates reported a presentation requirement during the onsite interviews, which added pressure to articulate technical concepts clearly while managing technical discussions. This component was noted as a source of stress but also an opportunity to demonstrate communication skills.
Overall, candidates felt that the interview process was respectful and professional, with timely updates and a clear sense of evaluation criteria. Even in cases where offers were not extended, many appreciated the structured nature of the process and the opportunity for learning.
Some candidates completed take-home assignments that were described as demanding, with unclear expectations leading to varying levels of effort and stress. These assignments were often followed by interviews that focused on discussing the work produced.