Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Skydio, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My early stage felt like an alignment check more than a test of trivia. I had an initial conversation where they evaluated my understanding of the company and what it actually offers, and I spent time talking through my resume and prior experience to show fit for the role.
I went through a multi-round process that felt polished and pretty standard once it got going. It started with an HR round focused on general behavioral topics—how I worked in a team and questions about my CV—so they could understand how I think and communicate.
The interview process typically starts with a recruiter call, followed by a series of technical interviews and a final onsite loop, with a clear progression and careful sequencing between rounds. Candidates noted that the structure felt polished and methodical, with a focus on ensuring understanding before moving forward.
Candidates faced a mix of coding challenges, system design questions, and sometimes presentations, with a focus on practical problem-solving and reasoning rather than just theoretical knowledge. The coding questions varied in difficulty, often resembling LeetCode-style problems, and were accompanied by discussions to assess depth of understanding.
Initial rounds often included behavioral questions aimed at understanding candidates' backgrounds and fit for the role, with a strong emphasis on resume-related discussions. This aspect helped establish a foundation before delving into more technical evaluations.
Some candidates reported a presentation requirement during the onsite interviews, which added pressure to articulate technical concepts clearly while managing technical discussions. This component was noted as a source of stress but also an opportunity to demonstrate communication skills.
Overall, candidates felt that the interview process was respectful and professional, with timely updates and a clear sense of evaluation criteria. Even in cases where offers were not extended, many appreciated the structured nature of the process and the opportunity for learning.
Some candidates completed take-home assignments that were described as demanding, with unclear expectations leading to varying levels of effort and stress. These assignments were often followed by interviews that focused on discussing the work produced.