Assessment Process
Candidates typically start with an online assessment that includes SQL and Python questions, often allowing the use of AI for assistance, followed by a take-home assessment that requires data analysis and written explanations.

Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Data Scientist at Shopify, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process began with a case-study style assessment that mixed SQL with Python coding and ended with a short additional assessment that felt like a logic-style check. Even though the questions were practical, the coding expectations meant I couldn’t just rely on intuition—I needed to be careful about both correctness and structure.
After I applied, I moved into an assessment-heavy process where they explicitly allowed AI help. My first hurdle was an online OA with both SQL and Python questions, and it ended up feeling surprisingly fast once I could lean on AI to get started. The next parts shifted between timed database work and deeper written-style evaluation: I did a take-home style assessment using pandas, where I had to query across provided datasets and also answer a couple of open-ended prompts with an actual short write-up summarizing what I found.
Candidates typically start with an online assessment that includes SQL and Python questions, often allowing the use of AI for assistance, followed by a take-home assessment that requires data analysis and written explanations.
The technical interviews often involve pair programming sessions focusing on SQL and Python, where candidates are assessed on their problem-solving approach and coding practices rather than just correct outputs.
Candidates can expect a behavioral interview that emphasizes their personal narrative and fit for the role, often described as a 'life story' session, which is integral to the overall evaluation process.
The interview process is generally structured with a clear sequence of assessments and interviews, although some candidates noted frustrations with scheduling delays and a lack of communication between stages.
Throughout the interviews, there is a strong emphasis on candidates' ability to communicate their thought processes and reasoning, particularly during technical discussions and behavioral interviews.
While many candidates found the process rigorous, some expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of follow-up communication after interviews, leading to feelings of uncertainty and frustration about their application status.