Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Seatgeek, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process started with a short recruiter chat. Soon after, I did what felt like an easier coding interview with a rate-limiting style LeetCode problem. If I passed that, the final stage was a bundle of rounds: two system design questions, a behavioral interview, and a “product feel” round where I reviewed the design of a page from SeatGeek’s website.
I started with a phone screen, and then I moved into a final interview loop that included LeetCode, system design, and behavioral questions. The coding problem was a pretty standard LeetCode style prompt, and the system design portion tied more directly to the company’s product domain.
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter call, followed by a technical screen and a series of onsite interviews that include coding, system design, and behavioral discussions. The overall structure is reported as systematic and organized, with multiple rounds that build on each other.
Candidates can expect coding interviews to be primarily based on LeetCode-style problems, often focusing on practical coding tasks rather than theoretical algorithms. The difficulty is generally perceived as average, but some candidates noted a strict expectation for exact answers.
System design interviews are a significant part of the process, with questions often tied to real-world applications and the company's product domain. However, experiences vary, with some candidates reporting poorly conducted sessions that negatively impacted their overall impression.
Behavioral interviews focus on cultural fit and personal experiences, with questions designed to assess values alignment. Candidates noted that these discussions felt genuine and were integral to the evaluation process.
Many candidates expressed frustration with the lack of feedback after interviews, feeling left in the dark about their performance and the reasons for rejection. This lack of communication was a common theme that detracted from the overall experience.
The overall tone of the interviews is generally reported as friendly and engaging, with interviewers appearing invested in the candidates. However, there are notable exceptions where candidates encountered rudeness or a lack of support during technical discussions.