Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Roche Pharma, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After I applied, the early stage moved quickly but not in a “talk to a recruiter” way. I got a short window to complete a video interview where I answered a set number of questions, mixing motivation with behavioural prompts. A couple of weeks later, I was invited to a technical panel interview that lasted about 45 minutes and included four senior team members.
I found the role through LinkedIn and applied via MyWorkday. It took a little under three weeks before I was contacted, and the first step was surprisingly self-contained: I was sent a link to record a video and given about a week to complete it. The questions were a mix of motivation/behavioural themes, and once I cleared that stage, the process became much more personal.
The interview process begins with a recorded video interview where candidates answer behavioral and motivational questions. This stage serves as a filter before moving on to more technical discussions.
Candidates face a technical panel interview that includes coding tasks and discussions about building datasets using R and Python, often in a collaborative format with multiple interviewers. This round emphasizes both technical skills and communication.
Following technical assessments, candidates engage in a managerial interview that focuses on fit and communication, often blending technical questions with discussions about team dynamics and project expectations.
Candidates typically participate in panel-style interviews with multiple senior team members, where they are assessed on both technical knowledge and behavioral fit. The dynamic can vary, with some candidates feeling more pressure in this format.
The overall interview process spans several weeks, with candidates noting that while the initial stages are well-structured, later communication can be inconsistent, leading to uncertainty about outcomes.
Many candidates reflect on the need for clearer expectations around technical evaluation and team dynamics, suggesting that preparation for both technical and interpersonal aspects is crucial for success.