Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for UX/UI Designer at Reddit, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process felt like it was built to keep moving, but in a way that still let me connect with people. I started with an intro chat with the head of design, then got a whiteboard exercise next. The last step was an “onsite” experience that centered on a portfolio presentation plus cross-functional interviews and peer design conversations.
After the initial back-and-forth to set things up, the recruiters felt genuinely helpful and friendly. When something hiccuped—an interviewer couldn’t make the session because of a family situation—they communicated quickly, swapped in someone else, and smoothed it over without making it a big deal.
The interview process typically includes an initial chat with design leadership, followed by a whiteboard exercise, and culminates in a portfolio presentation along with cross-functional interviews. Candidates noted that the structure was generally well-paced and avoided excessive repetition.
Candidates faced whiteboarding exercises that tested their design thinking under constraints, often framed as stress tests rather than collaborative sessions. The prompts were usually specific and required candidates to demonstrate their problem-solving approach in real-time.
The recruiting experience varied, with some candidates reporting disorganization and low engagement from recruiters, while others appreciated clear communication and prompt responses. Follow-ups were sometimes necessary to obtain updates on the process.
Interviews often included discussions around candidates' past experiences and design philosophies, with a focus on cultural fit and alignment with Reddit's values. Candidates were encouraged to ask questions to gauge team dynamics and expectations.
Candidates were required to present their portfolios multiple times throughout the process, which some found repetitive. However, the feedback received during these sessions was generally constructive and aimed at assessing design capabilities.
While many candidates appreciated the thoughtful nature of the interviews, some expressed frustration with delays in communication and decision-making. Overall, the experience was seen as respectful and engaging, even if it did not always lead to an offer.