My process didn’t feel intimidating on the surface at first. The first interview was very chill and mostly revolved around OOP fundamentals—things like the common “pillars,” general software engineering concepts, and how I reasoned about code while I talked. It was more about getting a sense of my thinking than quizzing me.
The second round was a clear step up. The call included multiple engineers and the hiring manager, and they went line-by-line through what I had written on my resume. They expected me to know the deeper technical details behind everything I listed, with a particular focus on C++ concepts. I felt like I had to defend my technical understanding rather than just describe my past projects at a high level.
3 months ago
Average Positive Goleta, CA
I started with a recruiter-style screen that was pretty straightforward and focused on getting my background. Depending on the day, it looked like a career-fair Q&A or a quick phone call where I walked through my resume and answered questions about basics like relevant coursework and general fit. I also got asked some security/clearance-related questions early, and it was usually a relaxed conversation that felt more like screening than a test.
After that, I had a small set of follow-up conversations. One round was with a hiring manager or a panel of managers, and it leaned on behavioral questions and discussion of my projects. The technical portion, when it showed up, was usually conversational rather than coding—covering OOP and a few C++ or programming-language concepts, plus questions about how I’d handle real work. Some panels were explicitly resume-focused (“design experience,” where I ran into issues, how I thought through problems), and even when they asked technical things, they stayed away from timed LeetCode-style challenges.
4 months ago
Difficult Positive Tucson, AZ
My interviews followed a more standard “talk and reason” path, but the technical depth ramped up as I went along. I started with behavioral questions …
5 months ago
Average Positive Andover, MA
My process started with a hiring manager phone screen that was about 30 minutes and felt structured from the start. A small portion was intro and role…
8 months ago
Average Positive United States
I had a pretty organized sequence that started with a short recruiter call where we covered compensation range, company culture, and the usual securit…
Unlock every Software Engineer interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Recruiter & Initial Screening
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter call focused on background, fit, and security clearance questions. This stage is generally relaxed and serves as a preliminary screening before moving on to more technical discussions.
Recruiter callBackground checkSecurity clearance
Behavioral & Experience Discussions
Candidates can expect a significant focus on behavioral questions and discussions about past projects, with interviewers probing for details and clarity on experiences listed on resumes. The STAR method is often employed to evaluate problem-solving and teamwork skills.
Technical interviews emphasize understanding core programming concepts, particularly in C++ and OOP, without relying on timed coding challenges. Candidates are expected to explain their reasoning and problem-solving approaches in detail, often through conversational formats.
C++OOPProblem-solving
Panel Interviews & Evaluation Style
Many candidates experience panel interviews where multiple engineers assess their fit and technical knowledge, often through a mix of behavioral and technical questions. The atmosphere tends to be friendly, but the evaluation can feel rigorous and detailed.
The overall interview process is described as efficient, with quick scheduling and a clear structure from initial screening to final interviews. Candidates report timelines ranging from a few days to a month, depending on the stage of the process.
Throughout the interviews, candidates are assessed on their ability to communicate effectively and present their work clearly. This includes discussing past experiences and technical concepts, which is often seen as critical for success in the interviews.
Communication skillsPresentationTechnical discussion