Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Qlik, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I started with a recruiter discussion where the tone felt unusually transparent and professional. The questions were straightforward: what interested me about the opening and how my previous experience and background mapped to the role. After that initial call, the process continued with two more conversations—one with the manager to get a feel for my skills and how I approached work, and a separate technical interview.
After a recruiter call, I ended up doing a fairly structured sequence: a hiring manager interview, then a take-home assignment, then an interview with the engineering team to walk through what I’d done, and finally a discussion with a department manager that felt more like an informal organizational fit chat. The whole process was paced like a standard pipeline, and the assignment was the main focal point.
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter call, followed by a series of structured interviews including a hiring manager discussion, technical assessments, and sometimes a take-home assignment. Candidates noted that the pacing felt organized and clear, with consistent communication about what to expect at each stage.
Candidates experienced a strong emphasis on technical evaluations, which included both coding challenges and discussions about specific technologies relevant to the role. The take-home assignments often required significant design and testing considerations, indicating a focus on practical application of skills.
Interviews often included behavioral components where candidates discussed their work approach and past experiences, typically with hiring managers. This aspect was aimed at assessing cultural fit and alignment with the company's values and expectations.
The technical interviews were described as detail-oriented and sometimes challenging, with a focus on specific implementation knowledge. Candidates noted that the lack of context during some technical discussions made it difficult to gauge the expectations, leading to a more stressful experience.
Many candidates appreciated the consistent feedback throughout the process, which helped them understand their standing and what to expect next. This transparency contributed to a more controlled and less stressful interview experience.
While some candidates did not receive offers, the overall sentiment was that the interview process was well-organized and professional. The combination of structured assessments and clear communication left a positive impression, even for those who were not selected.