After a recruiter call, I later went through a more traditional two-stage flow. First came an HR conversation focused on my background, what motivated me, and the logic of my professional plan. Then I had a deeper technical interview with the audit team manager. That second round was demanding but still welcoming: I talked through key technical definitions, we went through phases of an audit mission, and I faced professional-simulation style questions. They also probed what I knew about the firm’s digital tools, specifically Halo and Evidence Match, and I felt they expected real understanding rather than buzzwords.
The atmosphere stayed respectful even while the manager pushed to go further and corrected me when my explanations were too vague. Between the two steps, administrative documents were handled in the gap, and once the second interview ended, the timeline was pretty clear. I received a response a couple of weeks after the technical round. Overall, the process felt quite thorough, and when I ran into technical issues during the interview, the interviewer’s guidance and prompts kept me steady.
3 months ago
Average Positive Italy
My process felt like a fairly standard three-step audit-track journey. It started with an HR-focused conversation where I explained my background, what drew me to the firm, and my motivation for audit. After that, I moved into a manager or senior manager round that blended technical and practical understanding with a lot of behavioral evaluation. I remember discussing core audit-cycle ideas and the basics of auditing concepts, and they also asked me to walk through how I’d handle scenarios using clear communication and teamwork.
A big part of the second stage was “tell me about a time when…” style questions. They pressed on teamwork, problem-solving, how I communicated when things got challenging, and how I approached difficult moments. The technical side wasn’t just definitions—it also showed up as case-like situations related to audit procedures, so it felt like they wanted my reasoning, not memorization.
3 months ago
Easy Positive Nantes
My early stage experience felt relaxed and pretty light on trick questions. I went into it with the expectation of something structured and heavy, but…
3 months ago
Average Positive Manchester, England
My process started with a soft-skills focused assessment: I talked about teamwork, motivation for choosing the firm, and leadership potential. After t…
3 months ago
Average Positive London, England
Right after I applied, the process moved quickly into an online assessment with math and logic problems. I got notified about the next stage about a m…
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Interview Structure & Stages
The interview process typically involves multiple stages, starting with an HR conversation followed by technical and behavioral interviews with managers. Candidates can expect a structured flow, often including online assessments and group interactions before final discussions with leadership.
Candidates should prepare for technical questions related to auditing concepts, such as the audit cycle, assertions, and practical scenarios. Interviewers expect a solid understanding of relevant tools and methodologies rather than just memorized definitions.
Audit cycleAssertionsHalo and Evidence Match
Behavioral & Situational Questions
Behavioral questions are a significant part of the interviews, focusing on teamwork, problem-solving, and communication skills. Candidates should be ready to share specific examples from their past experiences using the STAR method to articulate their responses.
STARTeamworkProblem-solving
Assessment of Fit & Communication
The interviewers emphasize cultural fit and communication skills, often assessing how candidates articulate their experiences and reasoning. Candidates should be prepared for conversational interviews that gauge their alignment with the firm's values and teamwork dynamics.
Cultural fitCommunication skillsMotivational questions
Group Dynamics & Interaction
Some candidates experience group activities or discussions as part of the assessment, which test collaboration and engagement with peers. This aspect is designed to evaluate how candidates work in a team setting and contribute to group tasks.
Group activitiesCollaborationEngagement
Timeline & Feedback
The overall timeline for the interview process can vary, but candidates generally receive prompt feedback after each stage. It's important to be prepared for a potentially quick succession of interviews and assessments, with clear communication from the recruiters.