Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Perficient, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I applied through their careers site and got a recruiter outreach within about a week. The first phone screen was mostly a background conversation and why I was interested in the role, and it felt pretty organized from the start. After that, I moved into a more technical round with a senior developer, where the discussion covered technical agentic AI patterns and there was also some hands-on evaluation in the mix.
I started with what looked like a straightforward two-round process: a technical conversation followed by a managerial round. The technical part felt pretty basic on the topics themselves—things like Hibernate, Spring Boot, MySQL, and core Java. The managerial conversation was more high-level and focused on project discussion, and it went well.
The interview process typically includes an initial HR screening followed by two technical rounds, which may involve hands-on coding and discussions on relevant technologies. Candidates should be prepared for a mix of technical evaluations and managerial discussions, with some reports indicating a potential for additional rounds or changes in structure.
Candidates can expect technical questions centered around Java, Spring ecosystem, SQL, and software quality concepts, with a strong emphasis on practical application and fundamentals. It is advisable to be well-versed in these technologies and to prepare for both theoretical and hands-on coding challenges.
While initial communication is often prompt and organized, some candidates reported significant delays and lack of follow-through after interviews, leading to feelings of ghosting. Candidates should be proactive in seeking feedback and clarifying next steps throughout the process.
The interview format may vary, including both phone and video calls, with some candidates experiencing technical issues or a lack of engagement from interviewers. It is beneficial to ensure a stable connection and to engage actively during discussions to create a more dynamic interview experience.
Candidates noted discrepancies between the job description and the actual terms discussed later in the process, such as contractual work versus full-time positions. It is crucial to clarify job expectations and terms early on to avoid misunderstandings later.
The overall candidate experience varies, with some reporting a structured and respectful process while others felt it lacked professionalism and transparency. Candidates should prepare for a potentially rigorous evaluation while also being aware of the possibility of unclear outcomes or decisions.