Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Business Analyst at Northern Trust, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I went through a process that started with assessment and then moved into screening, but the lack of closure at the end left a bad taste. After an assessment round, I did an HR screening round and then expected the next interview step. The scheduling seemed to drag, and I remember waiting close to a few weeks for HR to respond. Eventually I received a rejection email, so the whole thing felt like it ended quietly rather than through real communication.
After I cleared an early assessment, I moved into interviews that felt fairly direct and role-focused. The process stayed smooth: I first did an aptitude-style round, then I had a manager round where the interviewer was friendly and the questions stayed tightly connected to what the role would require. I didn’t get the sense they were trying to make things unnecessarily complicated; it was more about my knowledge and how I thought through relevant work topics. The conversation felt professional and on-topic, with no major curveballs.
The interview process typically starts with an assessment test, followed by an HR screening, and then one or more technical interviews. Candidates noted a clear structure, but the pacing can vary significantly, with some experiencing delays between stages.
Interviews often include questions focused on finance fundamentals, such as derivatives, capital markets, and accounting principles. Candidates should be prepared for both basic and moderately challenging technical questions that relate directly to the role.
Behavioral questions are common, emphasizing candidates' past experiences and how they align with the company's culture and values. The tone of these interviews tends to be friendly and conversational, allowing candidates to express themselves comfortably.
While the interviews themselves are generally well-structured, candidates reported frustrations with the lack of timely communication and follow-up after interviews, often experiencing long waits for updates or feedback.
The overall difficulty of interviews is described as moderate, with candidates feeling that preparation on core concepts is essential. Many found the questions manageable, but the pacing and depth can vary by interviewer and team.
Candidates' experiences range from positive, with quick offers and supportive interviewers, to negative, characterized by long delays and lack of closure. The overall impression is that the process can be efficient but may leave candidates feeling uncertain if communication falters.