Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Navan, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I went through a very tight two-round process for a Senior Software Engineer role at Navan and ended up getting rejected. Round one was an online assessment with two medium-level questions, and it was locked to Java. Round two was a low-level design interview focused on a Flight Aggregation System, and that round also came with a language restriction (Java/golang).
My process kicked off with automated AI screening. I had a timer set for 20 minutes and the system cut me off strictly at the deadline, so I got stopped mid-answer and felt pretty thrown off by how rigid it was. I also felt like the process would have been smoother with a recruiter-style first screen instead of relying on the AI format.
The interview process typically starts with a recruiter screening, followed by multiple technical rounds that include coding, system design, and culture fit discussions. Candidates should expect a structured approach with a clear sequence of rounds, although the exact number and focus can vary.
Candidates will face a mix of coding challenges, often focused on algorithms, data structures, and system design. Expect to work with specific programming languages, primarily Java or JavaScript, and be prepared for both live coding and take-home assessments.
Interviews often include behavioral questions aimed at assessing cultural fit and collaboration style. Candidates should be ready to discuss past experiences and how they align with the company's values.
Candidate experiences vary significantly in terms of professionalism and interviewer demeanor, with some reporting a respectful and collaborative atmosphere while others encountered rudeness and unprofessional behavior. It's important to gauge the interview environment and how it reflects the company's culture.
The overall difficulty of the interviews is generally perceived as high, with a focus on precise problem-solving and technical skills. Candidates should prepare for a challenging experience and be aware that partial credit for reasoning may not be acknowledged.
Feedback can vary, with some candidates receiving detailed insights after each round while others report a lack of communication and clarity about their progress. Candidates should be proactive in seeking feedback and clarifying next steps.
