My process felt mostly positive, but the communication definitely made it harder than it needed to be. Over roughly two months, I kept moving through intermediate stages and waiting on updates, and the lack of clear next steps made everything feel confusing at times. Even when I was still interested in the opportunity, I ended up feeling a bit frustrated because it wasn’t smooth to know what was happening or when I’d hear back.
What surprised me most was how often I had to actively request information just to get visibility into where things stood. I didn’t mind doing the interviews themselves, but the delays and unclear messages turned it into a waiting game. I never received an offer, and honestly the biggest reflection I left with wasn’t about my performance—it was that the process would have felt a lot more respectful and professional with more consistent updates.
6 months ago
Average Negative Paris
I went through a follow-up appointment that was more awkward than anything technical. The process included a physical meeting with people from the SI side—one developer and one analyst—and the overall atmosphere didn’t sit well with me.
I felt unnecessary pressure and the vibe was not really welcoming. What made it even more disappointing was that it didn’t end up connecting strongly to technical interest; it felt like there wasn’t much genuine evaluation of my skills. I left with a negative impression overall, and I wasn’t moving toward an offer.
9 months ago
Easy Positive Porto, Oporto
My journey started with a recruiter touchpoint, and then I had a more structured sequence after that—an introduction-type conversation and then techni…
12 months ago
Average Positive Porto, Oporto
I went through a pretty normal three-step hiring flow where the overall difficulty was average. It started with an introduction interview, then I had …
> 1 year
Average Neutral Portugal
I moved through a fairly lightweight process where the early stages focused on explaining my background and then adding just enough technical context …
Unlock every Software Engineer interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Interview Structure & Flow
The interview process typically follows a structured three-step format, starting with an introductory conversation, followed by a technical interview, and concluding with discussions involving team leads or project managers. This flow is designed to progressively assess both fit and technical skills.
Interview stagesTechnical assessmentTeam fit
Technical Focus Areas
Candidates can expect technical discussions centered around microservices architecture, SQL, and software fundamentals, with practical exercises that may include live coding or take-home assignments. The level of difficulty is generally average, with a focus on real-world applications relevant to the company's tech stack.
MicroservicesSQLLive coding
Behavioral & Fit Interviews
Interviews often include behavioral questions aimed at understanding a candidate's work style, team dynamics, and cultural fit within the organization. These discussions are typically more conversational and less technical, focusing on past experiences and motivations.
Behavioral questionsCultural fitWork style
Communication & Updates
Candidates have reported mixed experiences regarding communication throughout the interview process, with some expressing frustration over delays and lack of clarity on next steps. Regular updates are not guaranteed, which can lead to uncertainty.
CommunicationUpdatesCandidate experience
Interview Atmosphere
The overall atmosphere during interviews can vary, with some candidates experiencing a welcoming environment while others felt pressure or awkwardness, particularly in meetings with multiple interviewers. This can impact the overall impression of the interview process.
Interview atmospherePressureTeam dynamics
Outcome Reflections
Many candidates noted that despite their preparation and performance, they did not receive offers, often reflecting on the need for patience and stamina throughout the multi-stage process. The outcomes seemed influenced by factors beyond their control, such as organizational decisions.