Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Natera, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process felt unusually intense and strangely narrow for a senior role. It stretched into a three-hour block of coding work after an initial short screen—starting with a 15-minute screening, then a 30-minute behavioral portion, and then two separate 90-minute live coding gauntlets.
My first touchpoint was a fairly standard recruiter call, followed by a 45-minute Zoom with the hiring manager. Since it was for a senior position, I expected a deeper behavioral or project-focused conversation, but the hiring manager started with personal questions and small talk for the first chunk of time—things like why I stayed at my previous job and why I relocated.
The interview process typically includes an initial recruiter call followed by a series of technical and behavioral interviews, often spanning several hours and multiple rounds. Candidates reported varying experiences with the length and clarity of the process, with some feeling it was disorganized and lacking communication.
Candidates can expect a mix of coding exercises and technical questions focused on Java, SQL, and sometimes system design, with formats varying from live coding to theoretical discussions. Some reported frustration with the coding environment and the emphasis on syntax over practical application.
Behavioral questions are integrated into technical interviews, often focusing on communication, collaboration, and past experiences. However, some candidates felt that the behavioral portion was overshadowed by technical assessments, limiting the opportunity to discuss their fit for the role.
For senior roles, candidates may encounter system design prompts that require them to outline architectural decisions and design systems end-to-end, rather than just coding tasks. This aspect is emphasized as a critical part of the evaluation process.
The overall difficulty of the interviews can vary, with some candidates finding the process challenging and others feeling it was more about speed and execution than demonstrating real-world experience. Feedback is often minimal, leaving candidates uncertain about their performance.
Candidates noted discrepancies between the job description and the actual interview content, particularly regarding the focus on SQL over expected frameworks like Spring. This mismatch can lead to confusion and a feeling of being unprepared for the actual assessments.