Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Movate, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I started with an early communication-focused step, and after that I moved into an HR discussion. The whole process felt straightforward and I never got the sense it was trying to trick me—communication quality was what kept pulling the momentum forward. The technical portion (when it came) stayed mostly tied to networking basics: I was asked things like OSI-layer understanding, how packet flow works, and troubleshooting-style questions around networking.
I went through a fairly standard sequence: first an assessment that covered aptitude and verbal alongside basic technical areas, then a technical interview, and finally an HR round that evaluated communication, confidence, and whether I was willing to work in shifts or relocate. The whole pipeline felt clear, like each step had a specific purpose.
Candidates experienced a strong focus on communication skills throughout the interview process, with several rounds assessing clarity, fluency, and confidence in speaking. This aspect was often seen as a primary gatekeeper for advancing in the interview stages.
The technical interviews predominantly centered around networking fundamentals, including TCP/IP, DHCP, and ARP, with scenario-based questions that required candidates to articulate their understanding of how networking concepts function in practice.
The interview process was generally described as structured and predictable, moving through defined stages that included communication assessments, technical discussions, and HR rounds, which helped candidates understand what to expect at each step.
HR rounds focused on assessing candidates' backgrounds, aspirations, and cultural fit, often involving discussions about salary expectations and work conditions, which were seen as integral to the overall evaluation process.
While many candidates faced consistent networking questions, some reported variations in technical assessments, including coding tasks or deeper dives into specific technologies like AWS or Java, indicating a range of expectations based on the interviewer's focus.
Candidates noted that even when they performed well, the outcome often did not lead to offers, with some expressing dissatisfaction over delayed communication or unclear feedback regarding their performance, impacting their overall impression of the process.