┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 00:00 - 05:00 : Introductions & Expectations │
│ 05:00 - 22:00 : Problem 1 (Clarify -> Design -> Code) │
│ 22:00 - 40:00 : Problem 2 (Clarify -> Design -> Code) │
│ 40:00 - 45:00 : Q&A with Interviewer │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
**Be ready to go over:**
- **Arrays, Strings, and Two Pointers** – Efficient memory traversal, sliding windows, string parsing, and string manipulation.
- **Trees and Graphs** – Binary search trees, Lowest Common Ancestor (LCA), breadth-first search (BFS), and depth-first search (DFS) traversals.
- **Heaps, Hash Maps, and Stacks** – Managing state, frequency counting, fast key-value lookups, and tracking nested structures.
- **Advanced concepts (less common)** – Dynamic programming, trie structures, graph cycle detection (Tarjan's/Kahn's algorithms), and bitwise manipulations.
**Example scenarios:**
- "Given a string containing parentheses and letters, remove the minimum number of invalid parentheses to make the input string valid."
- "Implement a function to find the lowest common ancestor of two nodes in a binary tree where nodes may not have parent pointers."
### AI-Enabled Coding Round
**Meta Platforms** has introduced an AI-assisted live coding session into the loop for specific software engineering tracks. This round evaluates how effectively candidates utilize AI coding assistants inside a multi-file codebase.
Candidate Workflow in AI-Enabled Coding:
[Receive Task] ──> [Query AI Assistant] ──> [Critique/Refine AI Code] ──> [Integrate & Test]
**Be ready to go over:**
- **Code Critique & Prompting** – Formulating clear prompts for the AI agent and critically reviewing generated output for bugs, race conditions, or bad patterns.
- **Multi-File Architecture** – Navigating and editing real-world project trees quickly rather than writing isolated single-file functions.
- **System Refactoring** – Extending pre-existing codebases using AI tools while ensuring backward compatibility and adherence to clean design patterns.
**Example scenarios:**
- "Working inside an existing web framework, use the AI assistant to implement an rate-limiting middleware, verify the generated logic, and fix any performance bottlenecks present in the AI's proposal."
### System & Product Architecture Design
Required for mid-level (E4+) and senior candidates (E5/E6), the System Design round measures your ability to build scalable, fault-tolerant software systems. Interviewers expect candidates to drive the conversation, define requirements, estimate scale, specify APIs, and make clear database and network architecture trade-offs.
**Be ready to go over:**
- **Data Partitioning & Caching** – Sharding strategies, horizontal scaling, read-through/write-through cache layers, and cache invalidation protocols.
- **High Availability & Storage** – SQL vs. NoSQL choices, replication, event-driven architectures, queueing mechanisms (Kafka, RabbitMQ), and load balancing.
- **Network & Protocol Design** – WebSockets vs. Long Polling vs. gRPC for low-latency client-server communication.
- **Advanced concepts (less common)** – Consensus algorithms (Raft, Paxos), distributed lock managers, dynamic stream processing, and GPU/RDMA networking offloads.
**Example scenarios:**
- "Design an end-to-end global notification system capable of sending push notifications to hundreds of millions of mobile users within seconds."
### Behavioral & Cultural Alignment (Behavioral Round)
Meta evaluates candidates against company values such as **Move Fast**, **Focus on Long-Term Impact**, **Build Awesome Things**, and **Be Direct and Respect Your Colleagues**. Answers must highlight individual ownership and impact using the STAR format (Situation, Task, Action, Result).
**Be ready to go over:**
- **Conflict Resolution** – Working through technical disagreements with team members or cross-functional stakeholders constructively.
- **Navigating Ambiguity** – Taking ownership of poorly defined projects and driving them forward to measurable outcomes.
- **Project Impact & Trade-offs** – Quantifying project success using concrete metrics (e.g., improved system latency by 35%, reduced server costs by $200k/year).