After a recruiter-style start, I had to go through an online assessment first. It mixed SQL with aptitude and statistics-style questions, and the SQL part leaned on analytical constructs like CTEs and window functions. The overall vibe felt like it was testing whether I could think through queries logically, not just whether I could write the “correct” syntax under pressure.
About a week later (the timeline felt fairly spaced out), I moved into interviews that were very SQL-and-analysis heavy. One technical discussion focused on SQL and analytics, and the questions also touched root cause analysis style thinking. I remember being asked to reason about situations like revenue dropping—what could explain it and how I’d investigate it—so I had to show my thought process as I built the approach.
9 months ago
Average Neutral Bengaluru
I went through a tougher, on-campus style hiring flow where the pressure came from speed and intensity. The first stage was an aptitude section with hard statistics questions, followed by a bunch of SQL queries. It wasn’t laid-back at all—I had to solve within a fixed time window, and the SQL had enough bite that I had to triage what to attempt quickly.
After that, I entered a room-based technical round where multiple people sat together and worked on SQL on paper within about 15 minutes. The SQL focus stayed consistent with the earlier themes: CTEs, joins, and window functions like ranking/median-type logic. Then there was another technical + CV-based interaction, and it kept combining SQL reasoning with root cause analysis and scenario questions.
10 months ago
Average Neutral Bengaluru
My process felt pretty direct: I started with a technical round built around SQL, then I moved into an HR-focused conversation after. In the SQL round…
10 months ago
Easy Negative Bangalore Rural
I had a relatively lighter-feeling journey compared to the tougher stories I’d heard—still SQL-focused, but less overwhelming in format. It began with…
10 months ago
Difficult Neutral Bengaluru
My experience started with an online test that felt like a real SQL gate. The assessment had a dense set of SQL problems—enough that it felt like only…
Unlock every Business Analyst interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Online Assessment
Candidates typically start with an online assessment that combines SQL questions with aptitude and statistics, focusing on analytical constructs like CTEs and window functions. Performance in this round is crucial, as it serves as a gatekeeper for advancing to interviews.
SQLAptitudeStatistics
Technical Interviews
The technical interview rounds are heavily focused on SQL, requiring candidates to demonstrate their ability to write queries, reason through problem-solving, and apply SQL concepts to business scenarios. Expect questions on joins, window functions, and root cause analysis.
SQLRoot Cause AnalysisJoins
Case Study and Analytical Reasoning
Candidates will encounter case study questions that require structured reasoning and analytical thinking, often tied to real business problems. This aspect tests not only technical skills but also the ability to connect analysis to business outcomes.
Case StudyAnalytical ReasoningBusiness Context
HR and Behavioral Rounds
The HR rounds typically involve discussions about past experiences, problem-solving approaches, and fit within the company culture. Candidates should be prepared for behavioral questions and guesstimates that assess their analytical thinking.
HRBehavioralGuesstimates
Interview Difficulty and Structure
The overall interview process is described as structured and moderately challenging, with a consistent emphasis on SQL and analytical reasoning throughout. Candidates should be prepared for a fast-paced environment and the need to articulate their thought processes clearly.
DifficultyStructurePace
Communication and Interaction Style
Candidates noted the importance of communication during interviews, particularly in technical discussions where explaining reasoning and thought processes is key. Interviewers are generally described as supportive, but the pressure to perform can be intense.