The first step was a recruiter phone interview, followed by a technical interview with a team member. The technical portion was split cleanly into two halves: one part was about my background—personal questions tied to my experience—and the other half was a live coding problem.
It felt pretty balanced: they didn’t only test whether I could solve something on the spot, and they also wanted to understand how my experience connected to the work. The coding segment added some pressure, but it was tightly scoped, so it didn’t drag.
> 1 year
Average Positive United States
After a couple of screening conversations, I ended up in a longer virtual session that felt like it was designed to mirror real collaboration. The process included a half-day interview where I worked through a short presentation I had prepared, and then I spoke with multiple team members and even some people from other departments. That mix of audiences stood out because it wasn’t just about correctness—it was about whether I could communicate clearly across different contexts.
The rest of the loop leaned into how I approached solving problems with others. In discussion, people talked through a way to solve a problem collaboratively, and I found myself explaining the design of a project I’d done previously. When there were moments to ask questions, I was encouraged to dig into how roles connected and how the collaboration worked, not only to answer theirs.
Share your interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
