Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Medtronic, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After an HR call, I had a follow-up with the hiring manager. The overall vibe felt pretty straightforward and competency-focused: they asked about my past experience, including whether I’d worked in the medical device industry, and then moved into questions about the projects I’d done and how I’d worked with a team. Even when the questions turned technical, the emphasis stayed on how I thought, not just what answer I landed on.
My process started with an online assessment, and then I moved into a technical round centered on both systems thinking and data structures. I was asked to describe the architecture diagram for one of my projects, which immediately made the interview feel less like pure coding and more like explaining how pieces fit together. After that, the technical questions shifted into DSA.
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter screening, followed by a series of technical and behavioral interviews that can vary in length and format, often spanning several weeks. Candidates noted that timelines could be lengthy, with some experiencing delays in communication after interviews.
Technical interviews often include a mix of live coding exercises, system design discussions, and questions on data structures and algorithms, with an emphasis on understanding the candidate's thought process and problem-solving approach rather than just the final answer.
Behavioral interviews focus on assessing cultural fit and collaboration skills, with candidates expected to share past experiences using the STAR method to illustrate how they handle challenges and work within teams.
Candidates reported mixed experiences regarding communication throughout the process, with some feeling well-informed while others experienced a lack of clarity and follow-up, particularly after interviews.
The tone of interviews varied, with some candidates describing a friendly and engaging atmosphere, while others felt the process was more interrogative and less collaborative, impacting their overall experience.
The outcome of interviews varied widely, with some candidates receiving offers quickly while others faced unexpected delays or rejections, often leaving them feeling uncertain about their performance and the decision-making process.