Preparing for an interview at Mathematica requires a balanced approach. You must be ready to defend your technical and methodological choices while demonstrating a collaborative, mission-driven mindset.

Research Rigor and Methodology – You must demonstrate a deep, uncompromising understanding of your research methods. Interviewers will drill down into the details of your dissertation or recent publications. Be prepared to justify your research design, sample selection, and statistical models, and show that you understand the limitations of your approach.

Communication and Translation – Mathematica values researchers who can speak to both PhD-level economists and government program managers. You will be evaluated on your ability to explain complex quantitative concepts clearly and without jargon. Practice summarizing your research in a way that highlights its direct policy implications.

Mission Alignment and Collaboration – Unlike academia, where research is often a solo endeavor, Mathematica operates in highly collaborative, multidisciplinary project teams. You must show that you are excited about working with others, receptive to feedback, and deeply committed to using evidence to improve public well-being.

Adaptability and Project Management – In applied policy research, project scopes, client demands, and data availability can change rapidly. You need to demonstrate that you can manage your time effectively, adapt to unexpected methodological challenges, and deliver high-quality work under tight deadlines.

The hiring process for a Research Scientist at Mathematica is thorough, structured, and designed to evaluate both your technical depth and cultural fit. The journey typically begins with an online application, followed by initial screening conversations. For many candidates, especially those hired out of graduate school, the first round of interviews often takes place virtually or at major professional conferences such as the ASSA (Allied Social Science Associations) or APPAM (Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management) annual meetings.

If you pass the initial screening, you will be invited to a full-day interview, historically referred to as a "fly-out." In recent years, this has often been conducted virtually, though the rigor and format remain identical to the in-person experience. This day is a marathon, lasting around six hours, during which you will meet with 10 to 15 different employees across various levels of seniority.

The centerpiece of this full-day interview is your research seminar. You will deliver a 40-minute presentation on your dissertation or a major research paper, followed by a rigorous Q&A session with Mathematica staff. The rest of the day consists of short, consecutive one-on-one or small panel meetings where you will discuss your career goals, project experiences, and potential fit within specific research divisions.

The visual timeline above outlines the progression from your initial application to the final offer. Candidates should interpret this as a multi-stage marathon that requires sustained energy, particularly during the intensive full-day round. Use this timeline to pace your preparation, ensuring you allocate sufficient time to polish your research presentation well ahead of the final stage.

To succeed at Mathematica, you must understand exactly how you will be evaluated during the key components of the interview process.

The Research Seminar (Job Talk)

The research seminar is the most critical component of your evaluation. It is a 40-minute presentation followed by a highly interactive Q&A session. The audience will consist of researchers from diverse policy areas and methodological backgrounds, meaning some will be experts in your specific niche, while others will not.

Be ready to go over:

• The Policy Problem – Clearly state the social or policy issue your research addresses and why it matters.
• Methodological Framework – Explain your research design, identification strategy, data sources, and econometric models with absolute clarity.
• Policy Implications – Conclude with a strong discussion of what your findings mean for policy design, program implementation, or future research.
• Advanced concepts (less common) – Be ready to discuss alternative research designs you ruled out, complex sensitivity analyses, or how you would scale your research model to a national level.

Example scenarios:

• "An interviewer asks you to defend your choice of control variables and explain how omitting a specific variable might bias your treatment effect."
• "A researcher from a different policy division asks you to explain how your findings in education policy might translate to a labor market context."

The Technical Panel & Deep Dive

In addition to your presentation, you will participate in technical discussions or a deep-dive interview focused on a specific journal article, report, or your own past work. This is a highly conversational but rigorous test of your analytical thinking.

Be ready to go over:

• Data Limitations – How to handle missing data, measurement error, or small sample sizes.
• Causal Inference – Demonstrating a strong grasp of techniques like difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity, or instrumental variables.
• Research Ethics – Ensuring data privacy, human subjects protection, and unbiased reporting.

Example scenarios:

• "You are asked to critique a research methodology used in a published report and suggest ways to improve its internal validity."
• "An interviewer presents a hypothetical scenario where a client wants to change the evaluation design midway through a project, and asks how you would handle the methodological implications."

Mission Fit & Behavioral Evaluation

While technical skills are mandatory, Mathematica places an incredibly high value on culture, respect, and collaboration. They want to ensure you will be a supportive colleague who thrives in a team-oriented environment.

Be ready to go over:

• Your 5-Year Plan – Showing a clear trajectory of wanting to grow as an applied policy researcher.
• Handling Feedback – Demonstrating how you incorporate constructive criticism from peers and clients.
• Multidisciplinary Collaboration – Showing respect for different methodological approaches (e.g., qualitative vs. quantitative).

Example scenarios:

• "Describe a time when you had to explain a highly technical limitation to a client who wanted a simple, definitive answer."
• "How do you handle situations where team members disagree on the best analytical approach to a problem?"

As a Research Scientist at Mathematica, your day-to-day work will be highly varied and intellectually stimulating. You will rarely work on just one study; instead, you will balance multiple projects at different stages of their lifecycles.

Your primary responsibility will be designing and executing research studies. This involves writing evaluation plans, developing survey instruments, cleaning and analyzing large administrative datasets, and running statistical models. You will be expected to maintain the highest standards of scientific integrity, ensuring that your findings are robust and reproducible.

In addition to hands-on research, you will play an active role in project management and business development. This includes writing technical proposals to win new contracts from federal, state, or philanthropic clients. You will also collaborate closely with project directors, task leaders, and junior programmers, providing mentorship and ensuring that deliverables are completed on time and within budget.

Finally, you will be a key communicator of Mathematica’s work. You will write comprehensive technical reports, draft concise policy briefs, and present your findings directly to clients, at professional conferences, and to the public. Your goal is to ensure that the evidence you generate is accessible, understandable, and ready to be used by decision-makers.

Mathematica maintains exceptionally high standards for its research staff. To be competitive for a Research Scientist position, you must demonstrate a strong academic background and practical research experience.

Technical Skills & Qualifications

• Education – A PhD (highly preferred) or a Master’s degree with extensive professional experience in Economics, Public Policy, Sociology, Health Services Research, Statistics, or a related quantitative social science field.
• Quantitative Expertise – Deep knowledge of causal inference, econometrics, program evaluation methodologies, and statistical modeling.
• Software Proficiency – Strong, hands-on programming skills in statistical software such as R, Stata, SAS, or Python.
• Qualitative Methods (if applicable) – For mixed-methods roles, experience with focus groups, semi-structured interviews, thematic coding, and qualitative software like NVivo or ATLAS.ti.

Experience & Soft Skills

• Must-have skills – Proven track record of conducting independent research, a strong portfolio of written research papers or reports, and the ability to work collaboratively in a team environment.
• Nice-to-have skills – Experience writing successful grant proposals or government contract bids, prior experience working with federal agencies (e.g., HHS, DOL, ED), and specialized domain expertise in areas like Medicaid, early childhood education, or workforce development.

Q: How technical is the interview process compared to an academic job market? A: The technical rigor is comparable to academic positions, particularly during your research seminar. However, the focus is highly applied. While academics focus heavily on theoretical contributions, Mathematica interviewers will evaluate you on research design practicality, policy relevance, and your ability to work within client-driven constraints.

Q: What is the company culture like? A: Mathematica is known for having a highly collaborative, respectful, and supportive culture. Employees are genuinely passionate about public policy and social well-being. It is a non-partisan environment that values objectivity, high standards, and intellectual curiosity.

Q: How should I prepare for the marathon full-day interview? A: Pace yourself and get plenty of sleep the night before. Because you will meet with 10 to 15 people over six hours, you will need to repeat your background and research summary multiple times with enthusiasm. Treat every conversation as a fresh opportunity to show your interest and fit.

Q: Do I need to have a background in a specific policy area? A: Not necessarily. While having expertise in a specific area like health, education, or labor is highly beneficial, Mathematica also values strong generalist researchers who possess robust methodological skills and can adapt to different policy domains.

• Understand the audience for your job talk: Your audience will be diverse. Some will be experts in your specific econometric modeling, while others will be qualitative researchers or policy experts. Ensure your presentation has a clear, high-level narrative that anyone can follow, even as you dive into deep technical details.

• Research your interviewers: Once you receive your schedule for the full-day interview, look up the researchers you will be meeting. Review their recent projects, publications, and policy areas. Tailoring your questions to their specific work demonstrates high interest and preparation.

• Prepare questions for them: Mathematica researchers value candidates who ask thoughtful questions. Ask about their current project challenges, how they manage client relationships, or how they collaborate across different offices and divisions.

• Be ready for the "5-year plan" question: This is a classic Mathematica question. They want to see that you are committed to a career in applied policy research and want to grow within the organization, rather than using the role as a temporary stepping stone.

A Research Scientist career at Mathematica offers an unparalleled opportunity to conduct rigorous, objective research that directly shapes the future of public policy. It is a unique professional space where the intellectual freedom of scientific inquiry meets the tangible impact of public service. By contributing to large-scale evaluations and data-driven initiatives, your work will directly improve the programs that support millions of lives.

To succeed in this competitive interview process, focus your preparation on mastering your research seminar, refining your ability to explain complex methods to non-experts, and demonstrating a collaborative, mission-first attitude. Approach the marathon interview day as a mutual exploration of fit, showing the team your passion for applied policy and your readiness to tackle complex societal challenges.

For additional real-world interview insights, compensation data, and preparation resources, you can explore the community-contributed guides and reports on Dataford. With structured preparation and a clear focus on translating data into impact, you will be well-positioned to stand out.

The salary data above reflects compensation trends for research professionals at Mathematica. When reviewing these figures, keep in mind that total compensation is highly competitive and reflects the organization's commitment to attracting top-tier academic and professional talent. Base salaries are complemented by a robust benefits package, including an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), which underscores the collaborative and shared success model of the firm.