Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Magic Leap, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
A bunch of the process felt disorganized right from the start. I had times scheduled, including at least one phone screen where the interviewer simply didn’t show up, and I spent the entire meeting window waiting instead of being told to reschedule. When I reached out afterward by email, I didn’t get any real response or apology—just requests for availability again, and then silence.
I first got in touch with the recruiter pretty quickly after applying, and the scheduling felt surprisingly smooth from the start. The recruiter checked in during the process and kept me updated, which made the whole thing feel less stressful than it could’ve been. The first real conversation was with the hiring manager, and that call came across positively—more interest in my fit than a rapid grilling.
Candidates reported a mix of experiences regarding the organization of the interview process, with some experiencing smooth scheduling and communication, while others faced disorganization, missed interviews, and poor follow-up. This inconsistency can affect candidates' perceptions of the company’s professionalism.
The technical interviews often emphasized coding fundamentals and problem-solving skills, with some candidates facing multiple rounds of live coding and algorithm questions. The focus varied, with some candidates feeling the questions were reasonable while others found them overly challenging or disconnected from their experience.
Interviews included discussions about candidates' backgrounds and project experiences, with varying degrees of focus on cultural fit and values. Some candidates appreciated the respectful tone and constructive feedback, while others felt the process was more interrogative and less welcoming.
Many candidates expressed frustration with the lack of timely communication and follow-up after interviews, leading to feelings of uncertainty and disappointment. The inconsistency in updates about decisions contributed to a negative overall experience for some.
Candidates noted discrepancies between what was communicated about remote work and actual expectations during interviews, leading to confusion and frustration. Clearer logistics and alignment on role expectations could enhance the candidate experience.
While some candidates left with a positive impression despite not receiving offers, others felt the process was chaotic and unprofessional, impacting their perception of the company. The overall experience varied significantly based on individual interactions and the perceived engagement of interviewers.
