What is the interview process like at Macquarie Group for an Asset Management Analyst role?

Macquarie Group runs a structured loop that starts with an HR screen, then moves to technical assessments that can include psychometric or logic testing. After that, you go through in-person or virtual interviews with senior team members. The process can also include a case study where you demonstrate data synthesis and communication.

How hard are Macquarie Group interviews for an Asset Management Analyst role and what is the offer rate?

Candidates report the difficulty level as average across 7 reported interviews. The offer rate reported is 43%, so a meaningful share of candidates receive an offer.

What topics does Macquarie Group test for an Asset Management Analyst interview?

Expect finance and valuation fundamentals, including fixed income basics like bonds and yields, and comparisons like bond yields versus equity returns. Derivatives fundamentals also come up, including the differences between futures and forwards and their use in a portfolio. You may also be tested on real assets or infrastructure investing, real estate valuation using a warehouse-style example, and how to choose valuation metrics and KPIs.

What valuation and derivatives questions should I prepare for Macquarie Group Asset Management Analyst interviews?

Practice explaining the mechanics of a DCF and how you determine terminal value. You should also be ready to answer differences between a future and a forward, including how that impacts portfolio usage. Real asset valuation is likely too, including how you would value a warehouse compared to a traditional equity.

How does the Macquarie Group case study work for an Asset Management Analyst role?

The case study format is designed to test your ability to synthesize data and communicate your findings. In the broader loop, you also face interviews with senior team members that assess technical and behavioral competencies, so the case study is part of a wider evaluation of both how you think and how you present.

What compensation range do candidates report for Macquarie Group Asset Management Analyst roles?

Candidate and job-posting reports show base pay starting from $90k, with total compensation reported up to $225k. Pay varies by level and location, so your offer can land differently within that reported spread.

Macquarie GroupAsset Management Analyst

Updated Jun 10, 2026

Macquarie Group Asset Management Analyst Interview Experiences 2026

Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Asset Management Analyst at Macquarie Group, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.

Get your personalized Macquarie Group Asset Management Analyst prep plan

Answer 3 quick questions and we will build a free study plan with the exact topics and questions to focus on.

Build my free plan

Hot & recentNewest first

4 months ago

Average Positive Hong Kong

My process kicked off with an early recruiter screen that felt quick and straightforward. Not long after, I met the team overseas in China, and the role itself was essentially hybrid between Beijing and Hong Kong, which made the early logistics feel especially relevant.

Interviews focused heavily on fit and the real-asset angle. I was asked about my experience and why I liked real assets, then the conversation shifted into basic valuation thinking—specifically around how to value a warehouse and the kinds of metrics that matter. A lot of the technical questions came bundled with behavioral prompts, so it wasn’t just formulas; it was also how I explained my reasoning.

> 1 year

Average Positive Australia

My process started with the sense that it would be manageable: I ended up facing two rounds, and the interviews were aimed heavily at fit—whether I could work well as part of a team and whether I brought a genuine can-do attitude. There wasn’t an “interview as a script” vibe; the focus felt more like testing how I thought and how I’d approach learning once inside.

One later round took place in person at the Sydney office and involved two interviewers from different functions. It mixed behavioral conversation with a technical component because the role had a quantitative element, and they paid attention to my familiarity with models. Even with that added technical angle, the tone didn’t feel hostile—more like they were trying to understand both how I collaborated and how I would handle the numbers side of the job.

Share your interview experience

Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.