My experience started like many others—an initial recruiter call, then a manager-stage conversation that quickly turned uncomfortable. During the hiring-manager round, one interviewer came across as genuinely constructive and seemed to understand my answers. The other felt dismissive from the start, with an attitude that suggested no matter what I said, I wouldn’t be getting hired. It wasn’t the kind of disagreement that’s useful; it just felt demotivating and needlessly harsh.
The process also had a rushed, unprofessional vibe that stuck with me. At one point I was repeatedly interrupted while I tried to explain my project, and I was asked to draw the flow on a whiteboard instead of being allowed to finish my explanation. The panel’s tone felt sarcastic and dismissive, so the whole session stopped feeling like a conversation and started feeling like I was being judged on how I performed rather than what I could do.
7 months ago
Easy Neutral Bucharest, Bucuresti
After a recruiter screening, my process moved fairly quickly into a short technical phone interview. It felt relaxed and the questions were mostly fundamentals: version control, http methods, and core object-oriented programming principles. When I finished those, the conversation shifted into a few scenario-style questions about how I’d approach solving problems and what steps I’d take to get to an answer.
A bit later, I went through an additional structured technical-and-HR style sequence. The technical part involved a small LeetCode-style assessment at an easy level alongside discussion of my background—my work experience, the tech stack I’d used, and specific projects I’d worked on. The HR conversation then covered more traditional topics like why I was leaving and why I wanted to work at Lenovo, and it stayed grounded and straightforward throughout.
7 months ago
Average Negative Singapore
I went through a few rounds, and the experience itself wasn’t the issue—the problem was what happened after. After the interviews, I didn’t hear anyth…
> 1 year
Average Positive Chicago, IL
The process I experienced felt noticeably smooth and even encouraging. I went in expecting a standard sequence, but the overall atmosphere stayed rela…
> 1 year
Average Negative Ciudad de Mexico
Pasó cerca de un mes desde que hablé con reclutamiento hasta la última etapa. En total tuve cuatro entrevistas: empezaron con una llamada con la reclu…
Unlock every Software Engineer interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Interview Structure & Flow
The interview process typically consists of a recruiter call followed by multiple rounds, including technical and behavioral assessments. Candidates noted a generally structured flow, often moving from introductory conversations to technical evaluations and concluding with HR discussions.
Candidates experienced a mix of technical interviews, including coding challenges, algorithm questions, and discussions around programming fundamentals. The difficulty varied, with some candidates describing the technical rounds as average while others found them intense and challenging.
Behavioral interviews focused on candidates' past experiences, teamwork, and alignment with company values. Many candidates felt these discussions were aimed at assessing cultural fit rather than purely technical skills.
Cultural fitTeamworkBehavioral questions
Interview Atmosphere
The atmosphere during interviews varied significantly; some candidates reported a supportive and constructive environment, while others experienced dismissive or harsh interactions. This impacted their overall perception of the process.
Candidates expressed concerns about the lack of timely communication and feedback after interviews, with some experiencing long waits for updates or feeling left in limbo regarding their application status.
CommunicationFeedback delayPost-interview silence
Overall Difficulty & Expectations
The overall difficulty of the interview process was described as average to high, with candidates feeling varying levels of preparedness based on the nature of the questions and the intensity of the technical assessments.