My process moved through a fairly intense sequence of work. After an initial lead interview, I worked through two Jupyter-based take-home assignments: one focused on general data science concepts and the other was a more classic machine learning problem. It felt like they were testing whether I could translate theory into actual work, not just talk about it.
After I turned those in, I interviewed with the lead and then went into what I genuinely thought was the finish line—a team round. I found the discussion practical and aligned with how a team would evaluate fit and thinking. Only later did I learn there was one last step: a short technical round with simple coding and SQL.
2 months ago
Average Positive Dallas, TX
My interview journey followed a pretty classic consulting rhythm: an initial recruiter/HR stage, then multiple rounds that blended fit with business thinking. I ended up doing several interviews across a few weeks, and while the vibe was friendly, the structure was consistent—each interviewer probed after my answers instead of letting me hand-wave.
In the later rounds, I ran into scenario-style questions that forced me to frame an approach, not just pick an opinion. The case content leaned toward integration/separation and M&A angles, and I had to walk through how I’d organize my thinking in that context. The discussions stayed grounded in how I’d approach the work as a consultant, with a noticeable emphasis on stakeholder management and problem-solving.
2 months ago
Average Neutral Bologna
I had an interview path that was longer and a bit more prepared-than-typical. It started with an online home assessment that included English multiple…
2 months ago
Average Positive United States
My process felt very structured and step-by-step. I started with an HR screen and then moved through consecutive interviews that ended with a partner.…
2 months ago
Average Positive France
I went through a fairly streamlined, communication-heavy process. A recruiter call kicked things off, and it set the tone: friendly, efficient, and cl…
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Interview Structure & Flow
The interview process is structured and sequential, typically starting with an HR screening, followed by multiple rounds that include behavioral, technical, and case study components, culminating in a final partner discussion. Candidates noted that the flow felt organized and transparent, allowing them to understand what each stage aimed to assess.
HR screeningstructured processpartner discussion
Technical & Case Study Rounds
Candidates experienced various technical assessments, including case studies that required problem-solving and analytical skills, often under time constraints. These rounds were designed to evaluate both technical competence and the ability to communicate reasoning clearly.
case studytechnical assessmentproblem-solving
Behavioral & Fit Interviews
Behavioral interviews focused on motivation, past experiences, and fit within the team and company culture, often using STAR-style questions. Interviewers probed for depth in responses, emphasizing the importance of demonstrating alignment with KPMG's values and expectations.
behavioral questionsSTARcultural fit
Assessment Formats
Candidates encountered a variety of assessment formats, including online tests, presentations, and group activities, which aimed to gauge both individual and collaborative skills. The assessments were often described as demanding but structured, requiring clear communication and reasoning.
online assessmentpresentationgroup activity
Interview Atmosphere & Support
The overall atmosphere during interviews was generally friendly and supportive, with interviewers encouraging open dialogue and clarifying expectations. Candidates appreciated the respectful tone, even when facing challenging questions.
supportive environmentfriendly toneopen dialogue
Communication & Feedback
While many candidates found the communication about the process clear and timely, some experienced delays and a lack of transparency regarding decision-making. This inconsistency in feedback and updates was a common concern among those who did not receive offers.