Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Consultant at KPMG Philippines, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My application moved into a highly practical phase fairly quickly. I was given two separate Jupyter-based take-home assignments: one was framed around general data science, and the other was a classic machine learning problem. It felt like they wanted to see both breadth and the ability to tackle a defined modeling task.
My interviews started with back-to-back sessions—one behavioral and one scenario-based. The scenario round was essentially a business case: I was asked how I would approach an engagement, with prompts that touched on integration, separation, and M&A style considerations. The whole format felt designed to test my structuring and reasoning more than memorized knowledge.
The interview process begins with a recruiter call followed by an HR screening, focusing on fit and basic qualifications. Candidates noted that communication was generally clear, but some experienced delays that added uncertainty.
Candidates typically faced behavioral interviews alongside scenario-based discussions, where they were asked to approach business cases or explain past project experiences. The emphasis was on structuring thoughts and demonstrating reasoning rather than rote memorization.
Technical rounds included practical assessments, often framed as case studies or mini-projects, focusing on real-world applications rather than theoretical knowledge. Candidates were expected to demonstrate their problem-solving process and technical skills in a structured manner.
The interview process was described as structured with multiple rounds, often involving various levels of interviewers, including managers and partners. Candidates appreciated the supportive atmosphere but noted that the pacing could feel intense, with little time to reflect between rounds.
Throughout the interviews, there was a strong focus on assessing cultural fit and understanding candidates' motivations for applying. Interviewers often probed deeper into candidates' backgrounds and career aspirations, emphasizing the importance of clear and consistent narratives.
Candidates reported a generally positive experience, though some expressed frustration over the lack of feedback after rejections. The process was seen as thorough, but the timeline and communication gaps sometimes detracted from the overall candidate experience.