My first step was a one-on-one call that lasted about half an hour. The conversation started with the usual prompts—talk me through your background and why the firm—then quickly narrowed into my research work. I felt like the interviewer was generally engaged, but they kept pushing for specifics about one of my programs until we were really drilling down into what I’d done, why I’d chosen it, and the reasoning behind it.
The overall experience felt solid and professional, but it was clear they weren’t satisfied with surface-level descriptions. By the end of the call, I had a good sense that the goal was to see whether I could defend my research choices in a detailed way, not just give a high-level overview. I didn’t end up getting an offer, and I left thinking I would have needed to be even more crisp and granular on that particular research thread.
7 months ago
Average Negative United Kingdom
My phone interview felt rough from the start. The interviewer seemed completely disengaged and was more focused on their phone than on what I was saying, which made the whole call feel distinctly unprofessional. They were huffing and puffing during the conversation, like the interview was a chore they’d been forced into.
The questions weren’t the part that bothered me most—the tone did. Even when I tried to answer clearly and keep the momentum going, the interviewer’s lack of attention made it hard to feel like there was genuine interest. I didn’t move forward from that stage, and honestly, it left me with a pretty negative impression of how the process was run.
7 months ago
Easy Positive New York, NY
After a first round that ran about 30 minutes with a team member, I moved into a superday-style set of conversations. In my case, I ended up speaking …
7 months ago
Difficult Neutral London, England
My process ended up being longer and more layered than I expected. Everything started online, and I moved through multiple interviews that were meant …
12 months ago
Difficult Positive United States
My interviews combined a lot of very practical research evaluation with long-form work. I started with a direct conversation with the hiring manager f…
Unlock every Research Analyst interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Initial Screening & Fit Assessment
The interview process typically begins with a structured phone screen focused on the candidate's background, motivation for the role, and basic technical questions, particularly around accounting fundamentals. Candidates should be prepared to articulate their interest in equity research and demonstrate a clear understanding of financial statements.
Fit assessmentTechnical questionsMotivation
Technical & Behavioral Mix
Subsequent interviews often blend behavioral questions with technical prompts, requiring candidates to discuss their research approach and financial concepts. Expect to explain your thought process and connect your experiences to the role, as interviewers assess both storytelling and technical knowledge.
Candidates may experience a superday format with multiple back-to-back interviews, often involving a mix of team members and varying focuses. This structure emphasizes stamina and the ability to handle diverse questions under pressure, so preparation should include practicing responses across different interview styles.
SuperdayMultiple interviewsStamina
Presentation & Modeling Exercises
Expect to engage in practical assessments, such as modeling exercises or stock pitch presentations, which test your ability to apply technical skills in real-world scenarios. Candidates should practice delivering coherent investment narratives and demonstrating their analytical capabilities under time constraints.
Modeling exercisesStock pitchAnalytical skills
Intensity & Evaluation Criteria
The interview process is described as intense and demanding, with a focus on depth and detail in responses. Candidates should be prepared for rigorous questioning that goes beyond surface-level understanding, as interviewers seek to evaluate both technical proficiency and cultural fit.
IntensityDepth of evaluationCultural fit
Communication & Follow-Up
Candidates noted varying experiences with communication throughout the process, including delays and lack of feedback after interviews. It's advisable to follow up after interviews and maintain a proactive approach to ensure clarity on next steps.