Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Intuitive, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After I talked with the recruiter, I moved through a sequence that felt pretty structured: a hiring manager interview and then a longer technical interview. The process accelerated once I was doing well—each step came relatively quickly after the previous one. The final stage was the biggest commitment: a full-day onsite that included both a personal project presentation and mini case studies.
I went through a fairly typical progression: phone screens and then Zoom interviews, and eventually I reached the full onsite. The day went well, and the next morning the recruiter reached out to ask for references—specifically requesting a manager from my current employer. I provided them, and after that the communication stalled.
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter screen, followed by multiple technical interviews and a final onsite or panel session. However, candidates reported inconsistencies in scheduling and communication, leading to confusion about the timeline and next steps.
Interviews heavily emphasize technical knowledge and problem-solving skills, often requiring candidates to explain their thought processes and tackle domain-specific questions. Candidates noted a mix of coding challenges and practical engineering scenarios throughout the process.
Behavioral questions are integrated into the interviews, with a focus on understanding candidates' past experiences and how they align with the company's culture. Candidates reported that these discussions were often conversational rather than high-pressure.
Many candidates experienced delays and a lack of communication throughout the process, leading to feelings of frustration and uncertainty. Reports of being 'ghosted' or receiving minimal feedback were common, which detracted from the overall experience.
Onsite and panel interviews often include multiple interviewers assessing candidates from different perspectives, which can create a more thorough evaluation but also lead to a feeling of being scrutinized. Candidates noted varying levels of engagement from interviewers during these sessions.
The overall difficulty of the interviews was noted as high, with candidates feeling the pressure to perform well under time constraints. While many found the technical challenges rigorous, the lack of closure and follow-up left a negative impression for those who did not receive offers.