Intercontinental Exchange Holdings logo
Intercontinental Exchange HoldingsQA Automation Engineer
Updated Dec 6, 2025

Intercontinental Exchange Holdings QA Automation Engineer Interview Experiences 2026

Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for QA Automation Engineer at Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.

Get your personalized Intercontinental Exchange Holdings QA Automation Engineer prep plan
Answer 3 quick questions and we will build a free study plan with the exact topics and questions to focus on.
Build my free plan
Hot & recentNewest first
11 months ago
Difficult Negative Pune

I went through a long, full-day hiring drive that felt heavy on technical screening but light on transparency. After getting shortlisted and arriving at the venue early, the start was chaotic—names and entry checks didn’t line up cleanly, and it created a tense, uncertain mood before the first conversation even began. Once inside, I ended up doing multiple back-to-back rounds, with a coding component early on and then technical discussion focused on core Java and Selenium, plus Git and CI/CD concepts. Some parts felt more like a QA day-to-day and Agile discussion, while others pushed into deeper territory like API testing and testing-related coding.

There was also an HR conversation and then a higher-level discussion centered on roles, responsibilities, expectations, motivation to join, and comfort working from the office five days a week. Even after clearing all those stages in the same day, I didn’t get a clear sense of where I stood. What surprised me most was how long it dragged without meaningful feedback: after about two weeks I was pulled into more technical sessions on specific projects, each lasting close to an hour or slightly under, and I still didn’t receive any outcome or follow-up. By the time I’d gone through several rounds, the lack of clarity and repeated technical evaluations without any feedback left me feeling confused and disappointed, even though the interviewers stayed professional and the discussions were genuinely technical.
11 months ago
Average Positive Hyderābād

My experience with ICE felt unusually calm and conversational compared to many QA interviews I’d done. After a resume shortlisting, I ended up in a relatively brief technical conversation—more like a discussion than a high-pressure assessment. The interviewer stayed polite and friendly and made the tone comfortable, and the conversation naturally flowed into the tools and frameworks they worked with.

When the questions came, they weren’t framed like trick prompts. It felt like we were talking through testing ideas and how real projects were built and verified, rather than racing through memorized topics. That made it easier to stay engaged even though I didn’t end up being selected.

Unlock every QA Automation Engineer interview experience

Real QA Automation Engineer interview experiences
  • Difficulty, sentiment and outcomes
  • New reports added every week
See all experiences
Share your interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.