Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at iHerb, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After I applied, the process felt fairly structured: I started with an initial recruiter call, then an HR call, and then moved into a screen with the hiring manager. From there, it turned into a longer in-person stretch where I met multiple people on the team and had follow-ups back with the recruiter. The whole journey leaned on understanding my prior work and mapping it to how the role would be done day to day.
My experience started normally enough: I went through multiple rounds and the interviews themselves were pretty casual in tone, with the team members acting cordial and transparent. I got through what looked like the expected progression—early discussions and then interviews with people in the org—so I assumed things were on track.
The interview process typically follows a multi-stage structure, starting with a recruiter call, followed by a technical screen with the hiring manager, and then an onsite interview with multiple team members. Candidates noted that while the flow was generally straightforward, scheduling and communication could sometimes be inconsistent.
Interviews often emphasize practical technical skills and knowledge relevant to the role, with a mix of coding challenges and system design questions. However, some candidates experienced unexpected questions on technologies not listed in the job description, which led to frustration.
Candidates reported a strong focus on behavioral questions and discussions around past work experiences, especially during the initial stages of the interview process. This conversational approach was generally appreciated, but the depth of technical questioning varied.
Several candidates highlighted issues with communication and coordination throughout the process, including last-minute reschedules and lack of updates after interviews, which contributed to feelings of frustration and uncertainty about their status.
The atmosphere during interviews varied significantly, with some candidates experiencing a professional and engaging environment, while others noted distractions and a lack of focus from interviewers, which negatively impacted their performance.
The pacing of the interview process can fluctuate, with some candidates experiencing quick turnarounds and others facing lengthy delays in decision-making, leading to uncertainty about the outcome and overall experience.
