Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Hexagon, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My first interaction with the team was the more general HR-style conversation, where the focus was on my background and resume alignment rather than anything deep and technical. The transition to the technical part was a shift in gear: I was asked around signal mixing diagrams, and the whole point seemed to be to assess whether I genuinely had RF experience. Most of the follow-ups were still tethered to how my past work matched what was on my resume.
I started with an HR touchpoint that was basically about logistics and expectations. I joined a Teams call with the team lead and a senior engineer, and it felt more like a conversation than an interrogation—there was a lot of getting-to-know-you and alignment on what the role actually involved.
The interview process typically begins with an HR screening call followed by a structured series of technical interviews, often culminating in a final HR discussion. Candidates noted a clear progression through stages, with quick transitions between rounds once each gate was cleared.
Technical interviews often emphasize a mix of coding skills, object-oriented programming, and system design, with a strong focus on reasoning and communication during problem-solving. Candidates reported a variety of technical topics, including C#, SQL, and algorithms, with some also experiencing practical coding tests.
Many interviews included discussions aimed at assessing cultural fit and communication style, with interviewers paying attention to candidates' nonverbal cues and overall demeanor. The behavioral rounds often focused on collaboration, ownership, and handling pressure.
Candidates described the interview environment as generally supportive, with interviewers often helping when candidates got stuck, which helped reduce anxiety. The tone was frequently described as friendly and professional, encouraging open dialogue.
The overall difficulty of the interviews was perceived as moderate to challenging, with a clear expectation for candidates to demonstrate both technical knowledge and effective problem-solving approaches. Candidates noted that the bar was set high but manageable with proper preparation.
Feedback varied across candidates, with some feeling that the assessment criteria were clear and aligned with their skills, while others experienced disconnects between their expertise and the interviewers' expectations. Overall, many candidates left with a sense of clarity about their fit for the role.
