Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for QA Engineer at Globant, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I went through a QA-focused process that started with a recruiter touchpoint and then moved into technical rounds. Across my interviews, the content stayed broadly around QA fundamentals grounded in ISTQB-style concepts, plus practical QA engineering topics like manual testing, automation, and how testing frameworks fit together. I also had to answer in English at the end, and it stood out because the technical part transitioned quickly into language questions.
I experienced a longer, more segmented interview process than I expected. After initial scheduling, I ended up in multiple rounds that felt like repeated deep dives, and by the time it was done, it had stretched across several technical instances rather than staying compact. Even though I’d been told about the flow in advance, the timeline had some awkward gaps—there was a point where I didn’t hear back about the next stage right away after being informed about what would happen after the first call.
The interview process is segmented into multiple rounds, often leading to a longer timeline than expected, with potential gaps in communication about next steps. Candidates should prepare for a series of deep dives that may feel repetitive.
Technical interviews emphasize QA fundamentals, including manual testing, automation, and specific tools like Selenium and Playwright, with a mix of theoretical and practical questions. Candidates should be ready to demonstrate both knowledge and hands-on skills.
Candidates may need to communicate in both English and Spanish during the interviews, especially in technical discussions, so preparation for language-specific questions is advisable.
Expect practical exercises that assess real-world problem-solving skills, such as designing test cases and debugging, which are integral to the evaluation process. Candidates should be prepared to think on their feet and demonstrate structured reasoning.
The evaluation process can sometimes feel unclear, particularly regarding feedback and logistics, which may affect the overall candidate experience. Candidates should be aware that clarity in evaluation mechanics may vary.
The difficulty of the interviews ranges from average to hard, with a focus on both theoretical knowledge and practical application. Candidates might find some questions more aligned with textbook knowledge rather than real-world application.