Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Garrett Advancing Motion, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My interview experience felt professional and candidate-friendly from the start. The process was structured around a mix of technical and HR conversations, and even when the questions got challenging, the interviewers kept the atmosphere supportive and open—so I could explain my thinking without feeling rushed or shut down.
I first went through the Garrett recruitment portal by submitting my resume there. After that, I had two technical conversations: the first was with an engineering manager for a technical discussion, and the next was another round to go deeper before an HR chat. The HR conversation was brief and focused on introducing myself and talking through my most recent experience, and the whole process felt transparent with clear communication about what was happening next.
The interview process typically consists of multiple rounds, including technical discussions followed by HR conversations, often completed in a clear and organized sequence. Candidates noted a generally quick timeline from application to offer, with many receiving updates promptly between stages.
Candidates experienced a strong focus on technical skills, with questions often tied to their previous projects and practical applications rather than theoretical knowledge. The technical discussions varied in difficulty but consistently required candidates to demonstrate depth in their understanding of relevant technologies.
The HR rounds were generally conversational, focusing on cultural fit and alignment with the team, rather than just assessing technical capabilities. Candidates appreciated the relaxed atmosphere during these discussions, which allowed for open communication about motivations and past experiences.
Overall, candidates reported a professional and supportive atmosphere throughout the interview process, with interviewers being attentive and respectful. However, some candidates noted instances of tension or unfriendliness that impacted their experience negatively.
Many interviews centered around candidates' previous work experiences, with interviewers probing how past projects and responsibilities related to the role being applied for. This approach helped candidates feel that their backgrounds were valued and relevant to the evaluation process.
Candidates appreciated the clarity and transparency of communication throughout the process, including timely updates and constructive feedback, which contributed to a sense of respect and professionalism in the evaluation.