My process took multiple steps and ended up moving quickly once I got to the final stage. After applying, I completed two online assessments. Then I had a phone screening with HR, followed by a virtual test where the focus was Word and Excel. After that, I did a Zoom interview, and from there I went to an in-person interview.
At the in-person stage, I ended up getting an offer. What stood out to me most was how structured the sequence felt—assessments first, then HR, then skills and interviews, building toward the final meeting.
> 1 year
Average Neutral London, England
After applying, I hit the same kind of personality-style assessment flow. I first completed a situational judgment assessment, and then I was notified that I would move to the next round—except the next round turned out to be the same type of assessment again. I filled it out, expecting it to count toward progressing.
That’s when things got weird for me: I received a notification that I wasn’t a match after repeating the assessment. The timing made it sting too. I didn’t have to wait long—within about a week I was rejected, and I remember thinking it was frustrating that I had essentially answered the questions the same way both times.
> 1 year
Difficult Negative United States
My journey started with online self-assessment work that took a while to complete—first a shorter screen and then, after I cleared it, I was asked to …
> 1 year
Average Positive United States
My interviews ended up being much shorter and simpler than I expected. I went through two short interview rounds where the questions stayed fairly bas…
> 1 year
Average Neutral United Kingdom
My process felt straightforward at first and then dragged after the interviews. It started with simple personality tests where the expectation was to …
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Application Process & Assessments
Candidates typically begin with a series of online assessments, including personality and skills tests, which can take significant time and may feel repetitive. The assessments are structured to gauge consistency and fit before moving to interviews.
Phone interviews often follow the assessments and can vary in structure, with some being conversational while others feel scripted and high-pressure. Candidates should prepare for both informal discussions and rapid-fire questioning.
Phone screeningStructured questionsHigh-pressure
In-Person Interviews
In-person interviews are generally more relaxed and conversational, though they can include practical assessments like Excel tests. Candidates should expect a friendly atmosphere but may experience delays due to technical issues.
Communication throughout the process can be inconsistent, with some candidates experiencing delays in feedback or abrupt rejections without detailed reasoning. It's important to follow up but be prepared for limited responses.
CommunicationFeedback delaysRejection process
Overall Experience & Structure
The interview process is generally structured and organized, but candidates may feel the pacing is slow, leading to a lack of momentum. The experience can vary widely based on individual interactions and the specific interviewers involved.
Structured processPacingCandidate experience
Expectations vs. Reality
Candidates often find the interview process less intense than anticipated, with a focus on fit rather than deep technical dives. However, some report feeling that the process prioritizes speed over thorough evaluation.