I started with a recruiter call that felt genuinely good—professional, engaging, and full of useful context about what the role would involve. I left the conversation feeling like I had a clearer picture of the work and how the team thought.
After that, I didn’t hear back, and the process stalled without a clear explanation. Even so, the interaction itself still stood out to me as a positive first step, and I appreciated the insight I got from it.
> 1 year
Average Neutral Boston, MA
My process with Forrester felt multi-round and fairly deliberate. After connecting with HR/recruiting, I moved into interviews where the people I spoke with were thoughtful and willing to challenge my answers, not just take them at face value. The difficulty level was manageable overall—more about showing how I thought and handled scrutiny than trying to guess a single “trick.”
At the center of it was a writing and presentation component. I was given an assignment that I completed in writing and then shared through a presentation, which meant I had to organize my findings clearly enough to defend them live. The whole thing felt thorough but still fair, and I had support from HR and the hiring manager throughout.
> 1 year
Average Negative Sweden
I applied and heard back quickly, getting a first interview invitation within a few days. The recruiter started off by talking about a different role …
> 1 year
Difficult Neutral United States
I went through a series of 1:1 conversations with people on the research side, and the vibe ranged from friendly to genuinely pointed. Most of these w…
> 1 year
Average Positive France
My process followed a straightforward but rigorous sequence. I began with a discussion with the talent acquisition manager, then completed an intervie…
Unlock every Business Analyst interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Initial Recruiter Interaction
Candidates typically begin with a recruiter call that is described as professional and informative, providing a clear overview of the role and expectations. However, experiences with follow-up communication can vary, with some candidates noting delays or lack of responses after the initial contact.
Recruiter callCommunicationRole overview
Interview Structure and Rounds
The interview process is generally multi-round and structured, often involving a series of 1:1 interviews with team members and managers, followed by a presentation component. Candidates should expect a thorough evaluation that includes both behavioral questions and practical assessments related to the analyst role.
Multi-round1:1 interviewsStructured evaluation
Writing and Presentation Component
A significant part of the interview process involves a writing assignment and a presentation where candidates must defend their findings in front of a panel. This stage is designed to assess candidates' analytical skills and ability to communicate effectively under scrutiny.
Writing assignmentPresentationAnalytical skills
Behavioral and Situational Questions
Candidates can expect behavioral interview questions that focus on real-life scenarios and how they handle ambiguity and client interactions. The interviewers aim to evaluate candidates' thought processes and fit for the team culture.
Behavioral questionsSituational responsesTeam fit
Evaluation Style and Pressure
The evaluation style is described as rigorous, with interviewers challenging candidates to think critically and respond quickly to questions. This pressure is intended to simulate the demands of the analyst role and assess candidates' readiness for the position.
Rigorous evaluationCritical thinkingPressure
Timeline and Communication Clarity
The overall timeline for the interview process can be lengthy, often spanning several weeks to months, and candidates have noted a lack of clarity regarding next steps or feedback after interviews. Following up with HR may be necessary to receive updates.