Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Egen, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process started with an HR screening call, and then about a week later I had a technical screen on a platform. The coding portion focused on practical data-handling scenarios—banking-style problems around deposits, withdrawals, and account logic—rather than the usual algorithm-only vibe.
Recruiter outreach turned into a pretty standard technical flow. After an HR-style call, I was sent a CodeSignal-style coding assessment with four questions, mixing difficulty levels and even an SQL question. I remember it feeling straightforward compared to the way some companies hype these things up, but it still took real focus to get through everything in time.
The interview process typically starts with an HR screening call, followed by a structured technical assessment and multiple interview rounds, often completed within a week. Candidates noted that the process felt organized and on schedule, with clear communication during the initial stages.
Candidates encountered a variety of technical assessments, including online coding challenges that emphasized practical coding scenarios rather than traditional algorithmic problems. The assessments often involved building functions based on given scenarios, reflecting real-world applications of coding skills.
Technical interviews included live coding sessions and discussions on core technologies, particularly Java and related frameworks. Candidates reported that these interviews assessed both problem-solving abilities and familiarity with the specific tech stack relevant to the role.
Behavioral interviews were integrated into the process, focusing on candidates' experiences and how they align with the company's values. Interviewers often asked about past projects and experiences listed on resumes to gauge fit and practical application of skills.
While initial communication was generally positive, some candidates experienced significant delays or lack of follow-up after technical interviews, leading to frustration. This inconsistency in communication affected candidates' overall impressions of the process.
Candidates found the overall difficulty of the process to be medium to high, with a focus on core fundamentals and practical application. While many felt the assessments were fair, some expressed disappointment in the lack of offers and the perceived disconnect between their performance and the outcomes.